The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 04:15:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250904041516.3046-7-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904041516.3046-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

When CPUs are transitioned offline, set_cpu_sd_state_busy() is called
to exclude the CPU from nohz idle balancing. Currently, it is done
independently via sched_cpu_deactivate() but subsequent transition of
the nohz idle tracking into the sched domain hierarchy would require
each CPU's status to be updated in the new hierarchy generated during
hotplug / cpuset.

Call set_cpu_sd_state_{idle,busy}() from the fair_sched_class' offline()
and online() callback respectively to ensure "sd->nohz_idle" of the
updated hierarchy reflects the same state as "rq->nohz_tick_stopped".

The changes from the prior commit to always update the rq->sd and the
top cache domains from rq_attach_root() ensures that the offline()
callback works on the older hierarchy and the online() callback works on
the updated hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0e68371365a5..61e1b4deb3e8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12491,6 +12491,18 @@ static void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(int cpu)
 	atomic_dec(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
 }
 
+static void cpu_sd_exit_nohz_balance(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	if (READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
+		set_cpu_sd_state_busy(cpu_of(rq));
+}
+
+static void cpu_sd_reenter_nohz_balance(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	if (READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
+		set_cpu_sd_state_idle(cpu_of(rq));
+}
+
 /*
  * This routine will record that the CPU is going idle with tick stopped.
  * This info will be used in performing idle load balancing in the future.
@@ -12741,6 +12753,8 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 }
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
+static inline void cpu_sd_exit_nohz_balance(struct rq *rq) { }
+static inline void cpu_sd_reenter_nohz_balance(struct rq *rq) { }
 static inline void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq) { }
 
 static inline bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
@@ -12940,6 +12954,9 @@ static void rq_online_fair(struct rq *rq)
 	update_sysctl();
 
 	update_runtime_enabled(rq);
+
+	/* Fixup nr_busy_cpus and nohz stats. */
+	cpu_sd_reenter_nohz_balance(rq);
 }
 
 static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12951,6 +12968,9 @@ static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)
 
 	/* Ensure that we remove rq contribution to group share: */
 	clear_tg_offline_cfs_rqs(rq);
+
+	/* Fixup nr_busy_cpus and nohz stats. */
+	cpu_sd_exit_nohz_balance(rq);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04  4:14 [RFC PATCH 00/19] sched/fair: Distributed nohz idle CPU tracking for idle load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:26   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25  2:11     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:17   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25  1:48     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] sched/topology: Introduce "idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:02   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25  2:37     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04  4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250904041516.3046-7-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox