From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: zhangjiao2 <zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: misc: Make the code for allocating minor in misc_register more concise
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:07:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025090910-tactile-devourer-1070@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909085835.2784-1-zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:58:35PM +0800, zhangjiao2 wrote:
> From: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>
> There is no need to check the registered misc dev in misc_list.
> If misc_minor_alloc failed, it meens the minor is already alloced
> and the misc dev is linked in misc_list.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/misc.c | 32 +++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/misc.c b/drivers/char/misc.c
> index a0aae0fc7926..fc2f5e8b2f95 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/misc.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ int misc_register(struct miscdevice *misc)
> dev_t dev;
> int err = 0;
> bool is_dynamic = (misc->minor == MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR);
> + int minor = 0;
>
> if (misc->minor > MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR) {
> pr_err("Invalid fixed minor %d for miscdevice '%s'\n",
> @@ -221,32 +222,13 @@ int misc_register(struct miscdevice *misc)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&misc->list);
>
> mutex_lock(&misc_mtx);
> -
> - if (is_dynamic) {
> - int i = misc_minor_alloc(misc->minor);
> -
> - if (i < 0) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - misc->minor = i;
> - } else {
> - struct miscdevice *c;
> - int i;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(c, &misc_list, list) {
> - if (c->minor == misc->minor) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - i = misc_minor_alloc(misc->minor);
> - if (i < 0) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + minor = misc_minor_alloc(misc->minor);
> + if (minor < 0) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> }
> + if (is_dynamic)
> + misc->minor = minor;
>
> dev = MKDEV(MISC_MAJOR, misc->minor);
>
Does this pass the new test suite for the misc code allocation logic
that we now have in the tree? Or do we need to write a new test-case
for this codepath?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 8:58 [PATCH] char: misc: Make the code for allocating minor in misc_register more concise zhangjiao2
2025-09-09 9:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-09-10 1:44 ` zhangjiao2
2025-10-07 12:45 ` Greg KH
2025-11-27 9:55 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025090910-tactile-devourer-1070@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox