From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
<ming.li@zohomail.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
<rrichter@amd.com>, <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>,
<Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <alucerop@amd.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:43:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910134334.000062b5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827013539.903682-7-terry.bowman@amd.com>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:21 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
> The restricted CXL Host (RCH) AER error handling logic currently resides
> in the AER driver file, drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c. CXL specific changes are
> conditionally compiled using #ifdefs.
>
> Improve the AER driver maintainability by separating the RCH specific logic
> from the AER driver's core functionality and removing the ifdefs. Introduce
> drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c for moving the RCH AER logic into.
>
> Move the CXL logic into the new file but leave helper functions in aer.c
> for now as they will be moved in future patch for CXL virtual hierarchy
> handling.
>
> 2 changes are required to maintain compilation after the move. Change
> cxl_rch_handle_error() & cxl_rch_enable_rcec() to be non-static inorder for
> accessing from the AER driver in aer.c.
>
> Introduce CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS in cxl/Kconfig. Update pcie/pcie/Makefile to
> conditionally compile rch_aer.c file using CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Hi Terry,
Sorry it took me so long to get back this.
Anyhow a few 'scope' of export questions inline.
Jonathan
>
> ---
> Changes in v10->v11:
> - Remove changes in code-split and move to earlier, new patch
> - Add #include <linux/bitfield.h> to cxl_ras.c
> - Move cxl_rch_handle_error() & cxl_rch_enable_rcec() declarations from pci.h
> to aer.h, more localized.
> - Introduce CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS, includes Makefile changes, ras.c ifdef changes
> ---
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 9 +++-
> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 3 ++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 20 +++++++
> drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 108 +++----------------------------------
> drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> index 1c7c8989fd8b..028201e24523 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -235,5 +235,12 @@ config CXL_MCE
>
> config CXL_RAS
> def_bool y
> - depends on ACPI_APEI_GHES && PCIEAER_CXL
> + depends on ACPI_APEI_GHES && PCIEAER && CXL_PCI
> +
> +config CXL_RCH_RAS
> + bool "CXL: Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling"
> + def_bool n
Isn't that the default anyway? So probably drop that explicit default.
> + depends on CXL_RAS
> + help
> + RAS support for Restricted CXL Host (RCH) defined in CXL1.1.
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 12215ee72afb..c8a0c0ec0073 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RAS
> +void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +bool is_internal_error(struct aer_err_info *info);
> +#else
> +static inline void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
> +static inline bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return false; }
> +static inline bool is_internal_error(struct aer_err_info *info) { return false; }
For me the ifdef makes sense for the cxl specific one, but not the other two
which I think are reasonable interfaces to expose more generally.
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* DRIVERS_PCI_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile b/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
> index 173829aa02e6..07c299dbcdd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS) += pcieportdrv.o bwctrl.o
>
> obj-y += aspm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIEAER) += aer.o err.o tlp.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS) += rch_aer.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIEAER_INJECT) += aer_inject.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_PME) += pme.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) += dpc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 7fe9f883f5c5..29de7ee861f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
> * Note: AER must be enabled and supported by the device which must be
> * checked in advance, e.g. with pcie_aer_is_native().
> */
> -static void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> int aer = dev->aer_cap;
> u32 mask;
> @@ -1111,119 +1111,25 @@ static void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev)
> mask &= ~PCI_ERR_COR_INTERNAL;
> pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, mask);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors, "CXL");
Why put this one in the CXL namespace?
Maybe check the others as well. For instance is_internal_error()
doesn't feel CXL specific either.
>
> /**
> * pci_aer_handle_error - handle logging error into an event log
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bfe071eebf67
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/rch_aer.c
> +static int cxl_rch_handle_error_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct aer_err_info *info = (struct aer_err_info *)data;
> + const struct pci_error_handlers *err_handler;
> +
> + if (!is_cxl_mem_dev(dev) || !cxl_error_is_native(dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Protect dev->driver */
> + device_lock(&dev->dev);
Probably not one to bury in this patch (maybe you do it later in which
case ignore this) but given we are touching the code,
guard(device)(&dev->dev);
to allow early returns and no need to have the goto.
> +
> + err_handler = dev->driver ? dev->driver->err_handler : NULL;
> + if (!err_handler)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (info->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) {
> + if (err_handler->cor_error_detected)
> + err_handler->cor_error_detected(dev);
> + } else if (err_handler->error_detected) {
> + if (info->severity == AER_NONFATAL)
> + err_handler->error_detected(dev, pci_channel_io_normal);
> + else if (info->severity == AER_FATAL)
> + err_handler->error_detected(dev, pci_channel_io_frozen);
> + }
> +out:
> + device_unlock(&dev->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:35 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:57 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 17:48 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 8:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:18 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11 5:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55 ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 0:43 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 7:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30 0:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 8:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23 3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23 9:21 ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910134334.000062b5@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox