From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, liuwenfang@honor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] sched: Support shared runqueue locking
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:58:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250911095845.GC1386988@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250910183555.GV3289052@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 08:35:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I'll go untangle it, but probably something for tomorrow, I'm bound to
> make a mess of it now :-)
Best I could come up with is something like this. I tried a few other
approaches, but they all turned into a bigger mess.
Let me go try and run this.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2481,11 +2481,11 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct
* Returns (locked) new rq. Old rq's lock is released.
*/
static struct rq *move_queued_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
- struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
+ struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu, int flags)
{
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
- deactivate_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
+ deactivate_task(rq, p, flags | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
rq_unlock(rq, rf);
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ static struct rq *move_queued_task(struc
rq_lock(rq, rf);
WARN_ON_ONCE(task_cpu(p) != new_cpu);
- activate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ activate_task(rq, p, flags);
wakeup_preempt(rq, p, 0);
return rq;
@@ -2533,7 +2533,7 @@ static struct rq *__migrate_task(struct
if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
return rq;
- rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu);
+ rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu, 0);
return rq;
}
@@ -3007,7 +3007,7 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *r
if (!is_migration_disabled(p)) {
if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
- rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu);
+ rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu, DEQUEUE_LOCKED);
if (!pending->stop_pending) {
p->migration_pending = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-10 15:44 [PATCH 00/14] sched: Support shared runqueue locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 01/14] sched: Employ sched_change guards Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 9:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-11 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 10:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-06 15:21 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-10-06 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-07 5:12 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-10-07 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 9:33 ` [tip: sched/core] sched: Mandate shared flags for sched_change tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 02/14] sched: Re-arrange the {EN,DE}QUEUE flags Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 03/14] sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 04/14] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class switches Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 05/14] sched: Move sched_class::prio_changed() into the change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 1:44 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 06/14] sched: Fix migrate_disable_switch() locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 07/14] sched: Fix do_set_cpus_allowed() locking Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-30 0:12 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-30 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-30 12:47 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 08/14] sched: Rename do_set_cpus_allowed() Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 09/14] sched: Make __do_set_cpus_allowed() use the sched_change pattern Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] sched: Add locking comments to sched_class methods Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] sched: Add flags to {put_prev,set_next}_task() methods Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] sched: Add shared runqueue locking to __task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-12 0:19 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-12 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-12 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-15 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-16 22:29 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 22:41 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-25 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 21:43 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-26 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-26 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-26 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-26 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-29 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 23:49 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-01 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 23:32 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] sched: Add {DE,EN}QUEUE_LOCKED Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 2:01 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-11 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-12 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-12 16:32 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-13 22:32 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-15 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-25 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 14/14] sched/ext: Implement p->srq_lock support Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 17:32 ` [PATCH 00/14] sched: Support shared runqueue locking Andrea Righi
2025-09-10 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10 19:00 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-11 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-11 14:51 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-11 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 14:48 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-18 15:15 ` Christian Loehle
2025-09-25 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250911095845.GC1386988@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwenfang@honor.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox