From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B2D8287E; Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757859396; cv=none; b=QXGCGwIUmiA7rfFSlYxX3XmuRCAq42vPkS1koA/CgDP2WcU164+o/v0L23FlbfbQSk3n7zXl/1wBdrWTMm1bmun4cejlo044RwZtzpdDHkbOscCT51aC69CJnO037FYupqYEihILDYypcXojgpkZj+Kq/7dV/Ea0VkqhSe86kWo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757859396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LC3H0PVcyqKsgsnH8G6RjhY7nYzGXX6eP+wpc+zEEsM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BJVjXj5dAn/KElCMuCNeIRFS6iEW+A3EgtQx8iv1+JCVKhlG71Q8F+SAPrk4GTO9OAQ9/rCApRWxC6umKvvuB5wnwU0ElkLVPSyWdH5ziYQBMImzBh0ICoMsfMxGOBV47rtuhvGzDv1JTpgc945kDrU2YEnNxQriE0Xnuh7/Jrs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JTYB9lZj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JTYB9lZj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757859394; x=1789395394; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=LC3H0PVcyqKsgsnH8G6RjhY7nYzGXX6eP+wpc+zEEsM=; b=JTYB9lZjPD+zk2eMHjOaN5wVD+7PC7Rnr4CifeHV8Blj4ixpOhz1fnzn s5Og+SFO4aoFaWsXyU5XghEW17N1XPEotKSbpAiEzUE7eCtCP1DByVoXm 33QJr00lDj4DY2YKY/BtN76ugsx9ZG/L7O/Jh0hJAGIzTasQPNxqE8avM N1scrIDBqSAeKJoo6V/pIjK+ENJ6VW38ZMyStcmzIkztWCcggRqb2b7l5 DmyEg7cTxibD+DnCNxBdVtiRjlQhE3Dy73druFUnmvTRQ7XhL8oVAqouL pi9qGf/q0g4ncn1pA8fn+hp49vmL1t+66S7UEo9DaQUPfwhHkdXFEZQ6l w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hKcCLeKvQ6+/p9MEzuBpRw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XOlwq7e4TIukCBqyfFjvoQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11553"; a="71503324" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,264,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="71503324" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2025 07:16:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fKFq+2jnSAaSeZDt1z3VvQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Zi1Q9B4xRvyVk5+bxvVdOw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,264,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="174224891" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO eb5fdfb2a9b7) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2025 07:16:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by eb5fdfb2a9b7 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uxnWi-0002Sy-0K; Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:16:24 +0000 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 22:16:06 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ivaylo Ivanov , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] clk: samsung: introduce exynos8890 clock driver Message-ID: <202509142156.qb0htmwo-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250914122116.2616801-6-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250914122116.2616801-6-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com> Hi Ivaylo, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on krzk-dt/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.17-rc5] [cannot apply to krzk/for-next clk/clk-next next-20250912] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ivaylo-Ivanov/dt-bindings-clock-add-exynos8890-SoC/20250914-202302 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-dt.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250914122116.2616801-6-ivo.ivanov.ivanov1%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 5/5] clk: samsung: introduce exynos8890 clock driver config: csky-randconfig-001-20250914 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250914/202509142156.qb0htmwo-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: csky-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250914/202509142156.qb0htmwo-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509142156.qb0htmwo-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos8890.c: In function 'exynos8890_init_clocks': >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos8890.c:49:45: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 49 | #define QCH_DIS (QCH_MASK | FIELD_PREP(QCH_EN_MASK, 0)) | ^~~~~~~~~~ drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos8890.c:88:31: note: in expansion of macro 'QCH_DIS' 88 | val = QCH_DIS; | ^~~~~~~ vim +/FIELD_PREP +49 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos8890.c 39 40 /* 41 * As exynos8890 first introduced hwacg, cmu registers are mapped similarly 42 * to exynos7, with the exception of the new q-state and q-ch registers that 43 * can set the behavior of automatic gates. 44 */ 45 46 /* decoded magic number from downstream */ 47 #define QCH_EN_MASK BIT(0) 48 #define QCH_MASK (GENMASK(19, 16) | BIT(12)) > 49 #define QCH_DIS (QCH_MASK | FIELD_PREP(QCH_EN_MASK, 0)) 50 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki