From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBB622A4E5 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757996495; cv=none; b=qPaAYLWRsI/FQ9Pb7cumF6muy/ovQOiZ8OOS+zSj+1AiOoT83Ea88RYaJxqoQ8Hh/pZyCA9ev5bjamvIJg4xtuqjwlziSDAQLJHrF+IVwt0FfD2OkhXfA8K5cOE0+1KDTVm0hitytbLynt368ECTP/vB7q/HH1fOs0jg3fM0qaE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757996495; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G/Z5ifHDwolGtsQspjGTyjUZxMgScdgLSVhJoHQXb5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=iwAxjAcn55L+8fyA8smxKrOT6h4wFELBIaAkBwRottdC6xLqa/9xjsciv7EgoS9lbkLh8cHxVMmjrmDQnDXAiQIuQX6uQbgSDPwHeVLVirKze1zVitTcTkoFjB0OiTjOO0lKIWZ41d/rHRVR3BvFMwu8RmyPEXI4N1FNLeQSjtE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=Cb7MFG2o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="Cb7MFG2o" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19F7DC4CEEB; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:21:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1757996494; bh=G/Z5ifHDwolGtsQspjGTyjUZxMgScdgLSVhJoHQXb5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Cb7MFG2o22DQBwP+aWgNGe/EYSb85/ZZVoydPgU3NyYefQiJvxaC4xxYFqmzVMewh V71N/6ZuskZwVup/KRcrJs5OChrQNNvBFFavU6CvRMCFmDgxX8IVapTe5/6DekT/xc +vybv7bdd7UKZorLXUN6e6f1cEuc4aSrJUkhP8hY= Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 21:21:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, usamaarif642@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, harry.yoo@oracle.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, 00107082@163.com, pyyjason@gmail.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, souravpanda@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output Message-Id: <20250915212133.de5b8522137a5ed30efe956e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250915230224.4115531-1-surenb@google.com> <20250915171112.f71a7606a7f9fd3054662bed@linux-foundation.org> <20250915195633.96236cecebd8777243a770bc@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:34:33 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > > > could you fold it into the existing patch or > > > should I respin? > > > > A little fixlet would be preferred (by me, at least). > > Ok, should I post a fixup patch or you will do that in-place? I think the former, please. Your intent is preferable to my interpretation of your intent and we get all the nice patch metadata to track everything.