From: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
To: <sieberf@amazon.com>
Cc: <bsegall@google.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<dwmw@amazon.co.uk>, <graf@amazon.com>, <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<tanghui20@huawei.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<vineethr@linux.ibm.com>, <wangtao554@huawei.com>,
<zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Forfeit vruntime on yield
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916160036.584174-1-sieberf@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916140228.452231-1-sieberf@amazon.com>
After further testing I think we should stick with the original approach or
iterate on the vruntime forfeiting.
The vruntime forfeiting doesn't work well with core scheduling. The core
scheduler picks the best task across the SMT mask, and then the siblings run a
matching task no matter what. This means the core scheduler can keep picking
the yielding task on the sibling even after it becomes ineligible (because it's
preferrable than force idle). In this scenario the vruntime of the yielding
task runs away rapidly, which causes problematic imbalances later on.
Perhaps an alternative is to forfeit the vruntime (set it to the deadline), but
only once. I.e don't do it if the task is already ineligible? If the task is
ineligible then we simply increment the deadline as in my original patch?
Peter, let me know your thoughts on this.
Testing data below showing the vruntime forfeit yields bad max run delays:
vruntime forfeit:
• **yield_loop**: 4.37s runtime, max delay 272.99ms
• **busy_loop**: 13.54s runtime, max delay 552.01ms
deadline clamp:,
• **busy_loop**: 9.26s runtime, max delay 4.11ms
• **yield_loop**: 9.25s runtime, max delay 7.77ms
Test program:
#define PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_THREAD 0
#define PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_THREAD_GROUP 1
#endif
#include <sched.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int should_yield = (argc > 1) ? atoi(argv[1]) : 1;
time_t program_start = time(NULL);
// Create core cookie for current process
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, 0, PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_THREAD, 0);
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) {
// Child: yield for 5s then busy loop (if should_yield is 1)
if (should_yield) {
time_t start = time(NULL);
while (time(NULL) - start < 5 && time(NULL) - program_start < 30) {
sched_yield();
}
}
while (time(NULL) - program_start < 30) {
// busy loop
}
} else {
// Parent: share cookie with child, then busy loop
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, pid, PR_SCHED_CORE_SCOPE_THREAD, 0);
while (time(NULL) - program_start < 30) {
// busy loop
}
}
return 0;
}
Repro:
taskset -c 0,1 core_yield_loop 1 & #arg 1 = do yield
taskset -c 0,1 core_yield_loop 0 & #arg 0 = don't yield
Amazon Development Centre (South Africa) (Proprietary) Limited
29 Gogosoa Street, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925, South Africa
Registration Number: 2004 / 034463 / 07
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-11 9:51 [PATCH RESEND] sched/fair: Only increment deadline once on yield Fernand Sieber
2025-09-11 11:03 ` Alexander Graf
2025-09-11 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-11 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-16 13:35 ` Fernand Sieber
2025-09-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Forfeit vruntime " Fernand Sieber
2025-09-16 16:00 ` Fernand Sieber [this message]
2025-09-18 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-18 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-18 15:05 ` [PATCH v3] " Fernand Sieber
2025-09-24 8:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-26 4:56 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-16 9:33 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Fernand Sieber
2025-11-05 9:13 ` [PATCH v4] " Fernand Sieber
2025-09-17 19:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Fernand Sieber
2025-09-18 2:45 ` Xuewen Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916160036.584174-1-sieberf@amazon.com \
--to=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tanghui20@huawei.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangtao554@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox