From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Switch to physical address mapping callbacks
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:46:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917184625.GA10800@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917135819.GA1391379@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:58:19AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 04:41:28PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 08:32:48AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 01:36:44PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:46:17PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:32:06AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > > + if (!dev->dma_coherent &&
> > > > > > + !(attrs & (DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC | DMA_ATTR_MMIO)))
> > > > > > + __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(phys_to_page(phys), offset, size, dir);
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd keep going and get rid of the page here too, maybe as a second
> > > > > patch in this series:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, it is always unclear how far to go with cleanups.
> > >
> > > IMHO to maximally support what Matthew is working on I'd remove all
> > > the struct page things and prefer the pfn/phys variations from the MM
> > > side.
> >
> > ok, my patches can be found here:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=dmabuf-vfio
> >
> > I converted "struct page" path from all archs with .map_page.
>
> Yeah, that's right, I would split this into a few series
>
> This group is all fairly trivial stuff that didn't use the struct
> page or virt address at all:
>
> MIPS/jazzdma
> x86
> vdpa
> xen: swiotlb: (though make a phys_to_xen_pfn() macro)
>
> I'd also drop the ATTR_MMIO checks from x86 and jazzdma
> since the code is obviously fine with any phys.
It is not trivial as it sounds.
Let's take as an example MIPS/jazzdma, should we call to vdma_alloc()
in DMA_ATTR_MMIO case? or directly return "phys" as it is done in other
architectures?
>
> vdpa can support ATTR_MMIO with the same iommu prot MMIO adjustment,
> that would be a good additional patch.
There is "bounce page" in VDPA, it sounds like swiotlb to me, which
doesn't work with MMIO.
>
> Then there are more conversions that don't use struct page or va but
> are not so trivial
>
> alpha
> parisc
>
> Then the last ones sparc/power are quite complicated and do use
> __va/etc.
>
> Jason
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 7:32 [PATCH v3 0/4] Preparation to .map_page and .unmap_page removal Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dma-mapping: prepare dma_map_ops to conversion to physical address Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dma-mapping: convert dummy ops to physical address mapping Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Switch to physical address mapping callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 18:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 10:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-17 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 13:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-17 13:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 18:46 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-09-17 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-17 19:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 7:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dma-mapping: remove unused mapping resource callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 12:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-16 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250917184625.GA10800@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox