From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_unmap_io()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 19:49:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918014953.297897-18-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918014953.297897-1-csander@purestorage.com>
For ublk servers with many ublk queues, accessing the ublk_queue in
ublk_unmap_io() is a frequent cache miss. Pass to __ublk_complete_rq()
whether the ublk server's data buffer needs to be copied to the request.
In the callers __ublk_fail_req() and ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local(), get the
flags from the ublk_device instead, as its flags have just been read.
In ublk_put_req_ref(), pass false since all the features that require
reference counting disable copying of the data buffer upon completion.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index a677eca1ee86..5ab7ff5f03f4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -527,11 +527,12 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod_zoned(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
return BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
}
#endif
-static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io);
+static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
+ bool need_map);
static dev_t ublk_chr_devt;
static const struct class ublk_chr_class = {
.name = "ublk-char",
};
@@ -735,12 +736,15 @@ static inline bool ublk_get_req_ref(struct ublk_io *io)
return refcount_inc_not_zero(&io->ref);
}
static inline void ublk_put_req_ref(struct ublk_io *io, struct request *req)
{
- if (refcount_dec_and_test(&io->ref))
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io);
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&io->ref))
+ return;
+
+ /* ublk_need_map_io() and ublk_need_req_ref() are mutually exclusive */
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, false);
}
static inline bool ublk_sub_req_ref(struct ublk_io *io)
{
unsigned sub_refs = UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT - io->task_registered_buffers;
@@ -1046,17 +1050,17 @@ static int ublk_map_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, const struct request *req,
return ublk_copy_user_pages(req, 0, &iter, dir);
}
return rq_bytes;
}
-static int ublk_unmap_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
+static int ublk_unmap_io(bool need_map,
const struct request *req,
const struct ublk_io *io)
{
const unsigned int rq_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(req);
- if (!ublk_need_map_io(ubq))
+ if (!need_map)
return rq_bytes;
if (ublk_need_unmap_req(req)) {
struct iov_iter iter;
const int dir = ITER_SOURCE;
@@ -1144,13 +1148,13 @@ static inline struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(
{
return io_uring_cmd_to_pdu(ioucmd, struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu);
}
/* todo: handle partial completion */
-static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io)
+static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
+ bool need_map)
{
- struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
unsigned int unmapped_bytes;
blk_status_t res = BLK_STS_OK;
/* failed read IO if nothing is read */
if (!io->res && req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ)
@@ -1170,11 +1174,11 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io)
if (req_op(req) != REQ_OP_READ && req_op(req) != REQ_OP_WRITE &&
req_op(req) != REQ_OP_DRV_IN)
goto exit;
/* for READ request, writing data in iod->addr to rq buffers */
- unmapped_bytes = ublk_unmap_io(ubq, req, io);
+ unmapped_bytes = ublk_unmap_io(need_map, req, io);
/*
* Extremely impossible since we got data filled in just before
*
* Re-read simply for this unlikely case.
@@ -1747,11 +1751,11 @@ static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_io *io,
if (ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding(ub))
blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
else {
io->res = -EIO;
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io);
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub));
}
}
/*
* Called from ublk char device release handler, when any uring_cmd is
@@ -2392,11 +2396,11 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
if (buf_idx != UBLK_INVALID_BUF_IDX)
io_buffer_unregister_bvec(cmd, buf_idx, issue_flags);
if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)
req->__sector = addr;
if (compl)
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io);
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub));
if (ret)
goto out;
break;
case UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA:
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 1:49 [PATCH 00/17] ublk: avoid accessing ublk_queue to handle ublksrv_io_cmd Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] ublk: remove ubq check in ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-19 3:53 ` Ming Lei
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] ublk: don't pass q_id to ublk_queue_cmd_buf_size() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-19 4:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] ublk: don't pass ublk_queue to __ublk_fail_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-20 8:52 ` Ming Lei
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] ublk: add helpers to check ublk_device flags Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-20 8:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] ublk: don't dereference ublk_queue in ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] ublk: don't dereference ublk_queue in ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] ublk: pass ublk_device to ublk_register_io_buf() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_register_io_buf() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_daemon_register_io_buf() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] ublk: pass q_id and tag to __ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_check_fetch_buf() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_config_io_buf() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] ublk: don't pass ublk_queue to ublk_fetch() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_check_commit_and_fetch() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 15/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_need_complete_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` [PATCH 16/17] ublk: pass ublk_io to __ublk_complete_rq() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-18 1:49 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-09-20 9:32 ` [PATCH 00/17] ublk: avoid accessing ublk_queue to handle ublksrv_io_cmd Ming Lei
2025-09-20 12:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918014953.297897-18-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox