Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Forfeit vruntime on yield

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:00:35PM +0200, Fernand Sieber wrote:
> After further testing I think we should stick with the original approach or
> iterate on the vruntime forfeiting.
> 
> The vruntime forfeiting doesn't work well with core scheduling. The core
> scheduler picks the best task across the SMT mask, and then the siblings run a
> matching task no matter what. This means the core scheduler can keep picking
> the yielding task on the sibling even after it becomes ineligible (because it's
> preferrable than force idle). In this scenario the vruntime of the yielding
> task runs away rapidly, which causes problematic imbalances later on.
> 
> Perhaps an alternative is to forfeit the vruntime (set it to the deadline), but
> only once. I.e don't do it if the task is already ineligible? If the task is
> ineligible then we simply increment the deadline as in my original patch?
> 
> Peter, let me know your thoughts on this.

Sorry, I missed this email earlier. I'll go ponder it a bit -- my brain
is esp. slow today due to a cold :/