The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] rcu: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 03:17:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918101752.2592512-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3773a6e3-8ec8-48c5-9277-264cd8ccbb10@paulmck-laptop>

From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.

This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.

This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.

This patch adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request the use of
the per-CPU behavior. Both flags coexist for one release cycle to allow
callers to transition their calls.

Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.

With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.

All existing users have been updated accordingly.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 1291e0761d70ab..c51c4a0af6aa5e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4890,10 +4890,10 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 	rcutree_online_cpu(cpu);
 
 	/* Create workqueue for Tree SRCU and for expedited GPs. */
-	rcu_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	rcu_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	WARN_ON(!rcu_gp_wq);
 
-	sync_wq = alloc_workqueue("sync_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	sync_wq = alloc_workqueue("sync_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	WARN_ON(!sync_wq);
 
 	/* Respect if explicitly disabled via a boot parameter. */
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-16  0:01 [PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous RCU updates for v6.18 Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-16  0:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Document that rcu_barrier() hurries lazy callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-16  0:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Remove local_irq_save/restore() in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-16  0:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] rculist: move list_for_each_rcu() to where it belongs Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Miscellaneous RCU updates for v6.18 Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rcu: Document that rcu_barrier() hurries lazy callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] rcu: Remove local_irq_save/restore() in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rculist: move list_for_each_rcu() to where it belongs Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] rcu: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-18 10:17   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-09-19 13:32     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rcu: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250918101752.2592512-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox