From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FA9A48; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758326689; cv=none; b=sZ3JUq+aKzUj3Q/EIzRwO+SEkRlMEC58JCVwrJ0yuehJMDLdLfIaCg/CghUIpfj3jIiyKLCPVuXyby37BrirZ6hg+WUVbQEIgAGHvetTvJt14u5hPdmqLj4IpGgSpDan1GBklB6YvODhsbM9qMLFuEUNxMIK/IRr9RLIP9n7RVY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758326689; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+oMLUm3zyALPkDtD4PORikxHxeN8AHGD4CqWBRc13hs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nrdColrAGZd86Lz5ZOGj2IU8OTPPUC/kfJIsamlYNKZvtyqIRYnqWKjmk/zGDAZcW4Ds3jSb4Vb873VQl0q71Rs3pSJUb/dV2BAq7lNNbE7oHCW4qgVPzpW26KN0UHQXpFGN8jqS0AbqCFNRroPotxjUUNMeg+BERaITUbRe70E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=I7M9QiAO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="I7M9QiAO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08F82C4CEF0; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:04:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758326686; bh=+oMLUm3zyALPkDtD4PORikxHxeN8AHGD4CqWBRc13hs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I7M9QiAONNpmtiZgJSDVEw+mRgtc+5SXWYiErZIgkpc4NzxO8Yj3spZVrKtaV1pmo 2oezTp6n6DIkAIiLzeEZ9eVpnOxO557t2GW6oKqdQ6jQFZBTrWb21xlgziBfEC4J4e Uh0bulDA63J+fv96fDB27pVyRAbNOrp2xPt5iWPH6jxgu/6XRWkt6F0E9lhgdNWEK0 DLTYd6H6VWL+OHzT8X+VqqZOmZF/SoTUkNnVxOFiE1RECfeeB1OQ9j72NV3SUAg6hb lCD/tqf5UlSBPKzgmtQvy15xzZaci0sEsjgGAFoLpAFhMhXC+adxEkh44yxJG+LePk O2E/MGuCYFx+Q== Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:04:45 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: James Clark Cc: Jacob Keller , Florian Fainelli , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Vadim Fedorenko , Kory Maincent , Richard Cochran , Yaroslav Kolomiiets , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features Message-ID: <20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250918-jk-fix-bcm-phy-supported-flags-v1-0-747b60407c9c@intel.com> References: <20250918-jk-fix-bcm-phy-supported-flags-v1-0-747b60407c9c@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:33:15 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote: > James Clark reported off list that the broadcom PHY PTP driver was > incorrectly handling PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST and PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST ioctls since > the conversion to the .supported_*_flags fields. This series fixes the > driver to correctly report its flags through the .supported_perout_flags > and .supported_extts_flags fields. It also contains an update to comment > the behavior of the PTP_STRICT_FLAGS being always enabled for > PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2. James, would you be willing to test and send an official Tested-by tag?