From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: "Miquel Sabaté Solà" <mssola@mssola.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:11:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923061144.GS5333@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bjn24pmk.fsf@>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 02:51:15PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:58:14PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
> >> The second patch is a small cleanup after fixing up my first patch, in
> >> which I realized that the __free(kfree) attribute would come in handy in a
> >> couple of particularly large functions with multiple exit points. This
> >> second patch is probably more of a cosmetic thing, and it's not an
> >> exhaustive exercise by any means. All of this to say that even if I feel
> >> like it should be included, I don't mind if it has to be dropped.
> >
> > Yes there are many candidates for the __free() cleanup annotation and
> > we'll want to fix them all systematically. We already have the automatic
> > cleaning for struct btrfs_path (BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_FREE). For the
> > kfree/kvfree I'd like to something similar:
> >
> > #define AUTO_KFREE(name) *name __free(kfree) = NULL
> > #define AUTO_KVFREE(name) *name __free(kvfree) = NULL
> >
> > This wraps the name and initializes it to NULL so it's not accidentally
> > forgotten.
>
> Makes sense! I can take a look at this if nobody else is working on it,
> even if I think it should go into a new patch series.
Thanks, it's yours. Yes this should be in a separate patchset.
> Hence, if it sounds good to you, we can merge this patch as it is right
> now, and in parallel I work on this proposed AUTO_KFREE and AUTO_KVFREE
> macros in a new patch series (which will take more time to prepare).
I'd rather see all the changes done the same way so it's not __free and
then converted to AUTO_KFREE. Also the development branch is frozen
before 6.18 pull request so all that will be in the 6.19 cycle anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 14:58 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic in kmalloc Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-22 10:28 ` David Sterba
2025-09-22 12:47 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 6:13 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 6:47 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 7:00 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 8:00 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Prefer using the __free cleanup attribute Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-22 10:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc David Sterba
2025-09-22 12:51 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 6:11 ` David Sterba [this message]
2025-09-23 6:46 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250923061144.GS5333@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mssola@mssola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).