From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E429281530; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758625672; cv=none; b=tTsOcvGd9tHh+rSH5C0g9ZbPcX7i0Kc96eAkSAWyk3wX5zIY9JRy2U1o+Cm9RK4hjcy7CrUhgORGtZZdYn1+CD/Cjcft1eDlViqpIP6mTUs8W43pSmkNq6aucsU353NZFaAvweAC3Ui/p0GMZRlOygNgnhY3aQddpEz6uPCFxCk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758625672; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uf9bs5k9QG+5nyGAjqLHS32cg0hRvydRERDb3MH2K7s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ICzNH6pCJaVtURPoryv6Fx+/J9WdBysKDPV18tCZt+pgjq2zU2qeUVPw11jCQ6aeRD2QnnXu7m93WScSPCFgolDjGIZ47kgpByOhDo4esPY7MWDZefFrT5a4WKyN2m3VWmrUYU/mA3X8wcvZfBj6CB/qkX8h4piqsCqYX7V1Oo8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=j2zANbbo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="j2zANbbo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758625671; x=1790161671; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Uf9bs5k9QG+5nyGAjqLHS32cg0hRvydRERDb3MH2K7s=; b=j2zANbboPtxqqd35ajaF+PWJDU5URuSY6RNzKxf/hFEDY77Zyswdd86V dWSqh2cz2PzTe0/v8OmCaPwAZnBfLl+lGdfvD51WOR8G7nUntKrAV49KV W4/965nyqolq6+VNUeCrHHe8GKEfeiFnQjxIv7KJrbyIANbKAuevc/1Rs cWrzzgmgO2utNIwqe+OKhbSg60dfu1dE8AVQZAcW8nPBvQgCXjkyJzc0H Vd5Br+bFGnRdlUcngenQiexbDSNjdiGYx3IPw7pFImCLRrJZiT9YcbMyQ LhMFnaCUT23gV9inWP11InT7CWqrd2G/OdZV7OGS4JMcqOFdZtISFcU1u Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ibS4eyNpT+GWpjPYlIIcwg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: y8LFd0ZcS9iXBoEjG/x0uQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11561"; a="60119383" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,287,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="60119383" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Sep 2025 04:07:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: A0hX7eCORfmMYV+pqUM0xw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XFw+UBKWTTafDHqYtEDBUA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 84c55410ccf6) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2025 04:07:46 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 84c55410ccf6 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1v10s4-00032v-1w; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:07:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 19:06:49 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Marek Vasut , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Marek Vasut , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Magnus Damm , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Rob Herring , Yoshihiro Shimoda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar-host: Add static assertion to check !PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG Message-ID: <202509231859.HdRgUtEm-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250922153352.99197-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250922153352.99197-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> Hi Marek, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on pci/next] [also build test ERROR on pci/for-linus linus/master v6.17-rc7 next-20250922] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/PCI-rcar-host-Add-static-assertion-to-check-PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG/20250922-233709 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250922153352.99197-1-marek.vasut%2Brenesas%40mailbox.org patch subject: [PATCH] PCI: rcar-host: Add static assertion to check !PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250923/202509231859.HdRgUtEm-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250923/202509231859.HdRgUtEm-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509231859.HdRgUtEm-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/bits.h:30, from include/linux/bitops.h:6, from drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c:14: >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG)" 78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' 77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c:43:1: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' 43 | static_assert(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +78 include/linux/build_bug.h bc6245e5efd70c Ian Abbott 2017-07-10 60 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 61 /** 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 62 * static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 63 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 64 * static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 65 * little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 66 * stringification of the tested expression). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 67 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 68 * Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 69 * scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 70 * expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 71 * true for expr). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 72 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 73 * Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 74 * true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 75 * false. 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 76 */ 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 77 #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 @78 #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 79 07a368b3f55a79 Maxim Levitsky 2022-10-25 80 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki