From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECD2301033 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2025 14:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758896437; cv=none; b=Ire1V39fl+p+8EpuhQPgVOYVwWGT4dN7yni7dd+W+owtEHdOVCr9ef+zUMGdZJhzAGcYECZeWv9tIFgWl8cZovbA1VbK7fT1MOD8IvvgqV+VAAUiMlmy1WwFFg6Ot7p+r32Mn5T4IPl3tc0DS9lSr8/Q5Nm564lTgCX3ADEei+U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758896437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/1Mv1gU6xTTVzCsuxMDNlCGRLsirlhBlVGRI9pKPOcw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h/aBJ+50Rla24l1dMdzBeztZ+oiby2R+nyZECN3Rj83NyQMBmuReesg0M4AcQv/Tn+1KHgsvFBrVBKNUZVTgjNkfXnifgdM3wsTrQ6YfI4BwcWrZIG94LtRZ55xG8dCZ+x4DB8diPcqo4W9AHBifRYVxk8kL+JscNcgkyGTVdPI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Nbh4TK9K; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pckYf6CL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Nbh4TK9K"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pckYf6CL" Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:20:32 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1758896433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/1Mv1gU6xTTVzCsuxMDNlCGRLsirlhBlVGRI9pKPOcw=; b=Nbh4TK9KxwPZikt7lo9C/So9qEVLLXFgwvOylbw7edAe1WSKs9yvhCs0wMzR/4BWvdJzGj 9fVQdtLCxkP6sBwu1v23WIO6XWvJ8FdJnH2yfemVIJQ+8CMxBe1sCV66ik7q1JWyhtlUuO fDG1mw3bfTKHyGI47fpXlm0WAtlLRY2puUTn7KSSApMzQRh3jHkPZl0TyqoKyQv69ny7yk hCDPoCWWgzv8CKVhVnr/y3eh9h5v2uj9uVixqiiFHe5RUS3zoS9wuzz1jG5O0m/eJ5XuPT UiSBHgR4sEPflontfLoc6kHmy6/5rwSjcu/jkDN/Wo0k77N+CaGFhLDe6Q7qpQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1758896433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/1Mv1gU6xTTVzCsuxMDNlCGRLsirlhBlVGRI9pKPOcw=; b=pckYf6CLbgJ2Ni4L9wFfsiLPA2cAj2x5+bipA6HiPZN/7ZLNiIN5ae9Ysmjm7fFIpX3/Xl rPMo4UDmg08aLMCg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Vincent Mailhol , Shakeel Butt , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/local_lock: s/l/__l/ and s/tl/__tl/ to reduce risk of shadowing Message-ID: <20250926142032.3vMasceT@linutronix.de> References: <20250925-local_lock_internal_fix_shadow-v2-1-d3b85ee775a4@kernel.org> <6c49739d-6f2a-4c49-a04b-9774f10a6925@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6c49739d-6f2a-4c49-a04b-9774f10a6925@suse.cz> On 2025-09-26 16:16:56 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote: > +CC LOCKING PRIMITIVES maintainers. Looks like local_lock files were never > added to the section, should we? Yes, indeed. Would you be so kind or do you prefer me doing it? Sebastian