From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE8D1CD2C for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2025 14:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758897057; cv=none; b=j3SLFse4CE3p+VY1BLw81WZX0MydXb+t3awTr21Guag73xb+ApreASURFRdOe423vBcogjY2FEUWUxThxaiI6WWY3hqx9RjdPP6Bys9Sc37yQ/gRbrmDmXn6cB8kNFmX4FKsnkGe6iM5vuUPUUgqbDcnasUoDELAncoYElKD9CM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758897057; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pgVdzlMsm2HmNSxY2mm4KhjHI/hY3FaSKDzCM7Qwmg4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Payv6K6v/AtH9OTXOZ3dUBjxrGg7Ros/Qszy6v3GzHDMpyWYWrJ7OEdfdE6BvsxU9WFxSar5ccm+A6AUg2e7F16o/wCHOfeBHa1FCbUWnbGCiFqrrWLljMIKz2GvyQR5wob4pBEYid9gWk3KIbztY6Sn86a6I8jULUpkY2De6JA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=mpP3FFQs; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=88ta3RhW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="mpP3FFQs"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="88ta3RhW" Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:30:53 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1758897054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jS3g5y5kTwpzWvYTKSfteuHNN8u6xwodKaPs5Ub7JOU=; b=mpP3FFQs8uloea4cHBcZx7hBWL1VjheXn08f4t7ih8Q5sb1l4Lll/cUQRPpp761qCF/fRa HpMVqUJ52qVLW/mwOPAM4BgPggn2WXQrBvln51TwiNYiYqO7+bnwlXiM9KU4y8JuUxal0I b02m+2qPfz4XW21nNfHtoXc6ZOZG3IVYxBq6uDT92c8HIMCwEQpVj8d36UKa8fjrtg2DCf YbVYx3i1HDxPPDebrHnxC5aWLkPe3a0DD6Dvnqk1rNeRiam57+bdBVUhRmTnYVbIEwos2e lZC5iCtasmv1y+Pc+lvZuupDEe/Cai1sgF/4ube418snEf6f+vtVjrmtLRWR4Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1758897054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jS3g5y5kTwpzWvYTKSfteuHNN8u6xwodKaPs5Ub7JOU=; b=88ta3RhW8OF1Fb6mROckX39PIB4tqepFjygn5rJ0BMfQqAkq0QmfwPUUQtfg/ZA81hPasx iTqxQeMFBYM4NrDA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Vincent Mailhol , Shakeel Butt , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/local_lock: s/l/__l/ and s/tl/__tl/ to reduce risk of shadowing Message-ID: <20250926143053.Kk3jOwSw@linutronix.de> References: <20250925-local_lock_internal_fix_shadow-v2-1-d3b85ee775a4@kernel.org> <6c49739d-6f2a-4c49-a04b-9774f10a6925@suse.cz> <20250926142032.3vMasceT@linutronix.de> <70968d59-c7e1-4f9b-8e94-d6a66464e848@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70968d59-c7e1-4f9b-8e94-d6a66464e848@suse.cz> On 2025-09-26 16:29:33 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 9/26/25 16:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2025-09-26 16:16:56 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> +CC LOCKING PRIMITIVES maintainers. Looks like local_lock files were never > >> added to the section, should we? > > Yes, indeed. Would you be so kind or do you prefer me doing it? > > I'd prefer you as the author of it, but can do if you're too busy. Sure thing, will do. Sebastian