From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E787F1FB3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759076490; cv=none; b=o5w0NFiu4DFWuJ3pphtg7DbT7OIVCeN0gn7VR5i2hD4xzU4VdoVeffXVIM0hHnXqXczuU5ASGRCQEc81vRsDFynSgKztzbUA1kiWqDcKxYewK2E2VhL9M7u6pybO95/o6bn3sHFvBWlOUcItzBz/ldkhb/5/Hon3cU9AI032dVY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759076490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uV5cw3K0ZRdmaa+mJJ0Pmd2STO2wkJsUygE5yZLnV6I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=rRUa+8GXwESiPI3zo4hkO5HUNPXGNW3AvrnUnh4mvldKyGjtmOjsO6xI1jD1CRaN0w7f4tNK6pWwfuWOSOptGWYI1Pjs+9pnPnDV+oMiHLJk7AJqAADLrTe+sDMpCudEVxcPy/fAxIbJ99nZsO0wdoBSd6MHpeZf9uT0ZtAXjaQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=iL+ZZ3GP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="iL+ZZ3GP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759076487; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=uV5cw3K0ZRdmaa+mJJ0Pmd2STO2wkJsUygE5yZLnV6I=; b=iL+ZZ3GPER9u7J2s0odb9w/k7lwd0SNOjmD2MBMnFLofjl2KMqHRWHrRNVdVYrz249jrOx Ymge/eiLTXhSrDoUiY7Hess6aJ6pMvpzTSY6AeobUUkhemGIF7laRnEQgqmrsD3W90gmIJ 8MpTllhLhJHiwhyT9ev1fMrDeW4umhA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-134-4LyxC2CIMXWjZZJkRXRHNg-1; Sun, 28 Sep 2025 12:21:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4LyxC2CIMXWjZZJkRXRHNg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 4LyxC2CIMXWjZZJkRXRHNg_1759076483 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 523C919560AD; Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.40]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 33AF019560A2; Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Sun, 28 Sep 2025 18:19:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 18:19:53 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Boqun Feng , David Howells , Ingo Molnar , Li RongQing , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Waiman Long , Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/1] documentation: seqlock: fix the wrong documentation of read_seqbegin_or_lock/need_seqretry Message-ID: <20250928161953.GA3112@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Hello, I already tried to discuss this about 2 years ago, but nobody replied. Let me make another attempt. 1/1 is the trivial doc fix, but what do you think about "RFC 2/1" ? Does it make any sense? Oleg.