From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 11/11] tracing: Fix lock imbalance in s_start() memory allocation failure path
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:01:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930170303.049610095@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250930170135.285740909@kernel.org
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
When s_start() fails to allocate memory for set_event_iter, it returns NULL
before acquiring event_mutex. However, the corresponding s_stop() function
always tries to unlock the mutex, causing a lock imbalance warning:
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
6.17.0-rc7-00175-g2b2e0c04f78c #7 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
syz.0.85611/376514 is trying to release lock (event_mutex) at:
[<ffffffff8dafc7a4>] traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x2c4/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:131
but there are no more locks to release!
The issue was introduced by commit b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ':mod:'
events for modules not loaded yet") which added the kzalloc() allocation before
the mutex lock, creating a path where s_start() could return without locking
the mutex while s_stop() would still try to unlock it.
Fix this by unconditionally acquiring the mutex immediately after allocation,
regardless of whether the allocation succeeded.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250929113238.3722055-1-sashal@kernel.org
Fixes: b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ":mod:" events for modules not loaded yet")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 9f3e9537417d..e00da4182deb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1629,11 +1629,10 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
loff_t l;
iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (!iter)
return NULL;
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
-
iter->type = SET_EVENT_FILE;
iter->file = list_entry(&tr->events, struct trace_event_file, list);
--
2.50.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 17:01 [for-next][PATCH 00/11] tracing: Updates for v6.18 Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/11] tracing: Replace syscall RCU pointer assignment with READ/WRITE_ONCE() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/11] tracing: Have syscall trace events show "0x" for values greater than 10 Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/11] tracing: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/11] tracing/osnoise: Use for_each_online_cpu() instead of for_each_cpu() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing: Move buffer in trace_seq to end of struct Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/11] tracing: Remove redundant 0 value initialization Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/11] tracing: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/11] tracing/osnoise: Replace kmalloc() + copy_from_user() with memdup_user() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/11] ftrace: Fix softlockup in ftrace_module_enable Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/11] tracing: Ensure optimized hashing works Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250930170303.049610095@kernel.org \
--to=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox