From: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>
To: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux@yadro.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: switch to per-cpu page_frag_cache
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:24:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251001162459.GA4234@yadro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930-tableware-untaxed-6a68b2e1e970@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:34:14PM -0700, Chris Leech wrote:
>
> nvme-tcp uses page_frag_cache to preallocate PDU for each preallocated
> request of block device. Block devices are created in parallel threads,
> consequently page_frag_cache is used in not thread-safe manner.
> That leads to incorrect refcounting of backstore pages and premature free.
>
> That can be catched by !sendpage_ok inside network stack:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 467 at ../net/core/skbuff.c:6931 skb_splice_from_iter+0xfa/0x310.
> tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x782/0xce0
> tcp_sendmsg+0x27/0x40
> sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xa0
> nvme_tcp_try_send_cmd_pdu+0x149/0x2a0
> Then random panic may occur.
>
> Fix that by switching from having a per-queue page_frag_cache to a
> per-cpu page_frag_cache.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12
> Fixes: 4e893ca81170 ("nvme_core: scan namespaces asynchronously")
> Reported-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> index 1413788ca7d52..a4c4ace5be0f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ struct nvme_tcp_queue {
> __le32 recv_ddgst;
> struct completion tls_complete;
> int tls_err;
> - struct page_frag_cache pf_cache;
>
> void (*state_change)(struct sock *);
> void (*data_ready)(struct sock *);
> @@ -201,6 +200,7 @@ struct nvme_tcp_ctrl {
>
> static LIST_HEAD(nvme_tcp_ctrl_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvme_tcp_ctrl_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_frag_cache, pf_cache);
> static struct workqueue_struct *nvme_tcp_wq;
> static const struct blk_mq_ops nvme_tcp_mq_ops;
> static const struct blk_mq_ops nvme_tcp_admin_mq_ops;
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue = &ctrl->queues[queue_idx];
> u8 hdgst = nvme_tcp_hdgst_len(queue);
>
> - req->pdu = page_frag_alloc(&queue->pf_cache,
> + req->pdu = page_frag_alloc(this_cpu_ptr(&pf_cache),
> sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_cmd_pdu) + hdgst,
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
I am not good at scheduler subsystem, but as far as I understand,
workqueues may execute its work items in parallel up to max_active work
items on the same CPU. It means that this solution does not fix the
issue of parallel usage of the same variable.
Can anyone comment on this?
> if (!req->pdu)
> @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_alloc_async_req(struct nvme_tcp_ctrl *ctrl)
> struct nvme_tcp_request *async = &ctrl->async_req;
> u8 hdgst = nvme_tcp_hdgst_len(queue);
>
> - async->pdu = page_frag_alloc(&queue->pf_cache,
> + async->pdu = page_frag_alloc(this_cpu_ptr(&pf_cache),
> sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_cmd_pdu) + hdgst,
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
This line is executed in a different(parallel) context comparing to
nvme_tcp_init_request.
> if (!async->pdu)
> @@ -1439,7 +1439,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_free_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *nctrl, int qid)
> if (!test_and_clear_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_ALLOCATED, &queue->flags))
> return;
>
> - page_frag_cache_drain(&queue->pf_cache);
> + page_frag_cache_drain(this_cpu_ptr(&pf_cache));
This line is also definitely processed in other(parallel) context comparing
to nvme_tcp_init_request. And frees the still used pages by other queues.
> noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
> /* ->sock will be released by fput() */
> --
> 2.50.1
>
In total, my patch with a mutex looks more appropriate and more error-proof.
BR,
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 11:19 [PATCH] nvme-tcp: fix usage of page_frag_cache Dmitry Bogdanov
2025-10-01 6:31 ` Chris Leech
2025-10-01 16:41 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2025-10-01 6:34 ` [PATCH] nvme-tcp: switch to per-cpu page_frag_cache Chris Leech
2025-10-01 16:24 ` Dmitry Bogdanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251001162459.GA4234@yadro.com \
--to=d.bogdanov@yadro.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@yadro.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox