From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vincent Liu <vincent.liu@nutanix.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Check drivers_autoprobe for all added devices
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025100209-hefty-catalyst-e5b2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001151508.1684592-1-vincent.liu@nutanix.com>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 04:15:07PM +0100, Vincent Liu wrote:
> When a PCIe device is hot-plugged, or when a VF is created, the
> drivers_autoprobe sysfs attribute is not checked. This means that
> drivers_autoprobe is not working as intended, e.g. hot-plugged devices
> will still be autoprobed and bound to drivers even with
> drivers_autoprobe disabled.
>
> Make sure all devices check drivers_autoprobe by pushing the
> drivers_autoprobe check into device_initial_probe. This should only
> affect devices on the PCI bus as device_initial_probe is only called by
> pci_bus_add_device (bus_probe_device already checks for autoprobe).
> In particular, only hot-plugged PCIe devices/VFs should be affected as
> the default value of pci/drivers_autoprobe remains 1 and can only be
> cleared from userland.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Liu <vincent.liu@nutanix.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/bus.c | 3 +--
> drivers/base/dd.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
If this is a PCI-specific issue, why not cc: the pci developers and
maintainer as well?
Also, a PCI patch shouldn't be for the driver-core only, I think the
subject line needs to have "driver core" in it.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> index 5e75e1bce551..320e155c6be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> @@ -533,8 +533,7 @@ void bus_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> if (!sp)
> return;
>
> - if (sp->drivers_autoprobe)
> - device_initial_probe(dev);
> + device_initial_probe(dev);
>
> mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(sif, &sp->interfaces, node)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 13ab98e033ea..37fc57e44e54 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -1077,7 +1077,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_attach);
>
> void device_initial_probe(struct device *dev)
> {
> - __device_attach(dev, true);
> + struct subsys_private *sp = bus_to_subsys(dev->bus);
> +
> + if (!sp)
> + return;
> +
> + if (sp->drivers_autoprobe)
> + __device_attach(dev, true);
> +
> + subsys_put(sp);
> }
I don't see why this is specific to PCI VF devices. Did you see the
recent PCI patch for not probing VF devices that was sent out yesterday?
I think that might fix this instead:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251002020010.315944-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 15:15 [PATCH] PCI: Check drivers_autoprobe for all added devices Vincent Liu
2025-10-02 5:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-10-02 12:04 ` [PATCH] driver core: " Vincent Liu
2025-10-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v2] driver core: " Vincent Liu
2025-10-14 5:14 ` Greg KH
2025-10-14 12:10 ` Vincent Liu
2025-10-21 12:49 ` Vincent Liu
2025-10-22 10:32 ` Greg KH
2025-10-14 20:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-15 10:23 ` Vincent Liu
2025-10-15 16:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-22 12:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Vincent Liu
2025-11-04 13:16 ` Vincent Liu
2025-11-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND] " Vincent Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025100209-hefty-catalyst-e5b2@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.liu@nutanix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox