From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI from kernel
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:13:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251006191314.GA2706650@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002144850-4a498f99-418d-4888-80f9-0f24c6896318@linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 03:23:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> I investigated this some more and didn't really like the end result. The
> problem is that $(m32-flag) and $(m64-flag) will expand to nothing if the
> compiler does not support -m32/-m64. So for architectures which use
> different flags the current logic will just ignore the bitness. One way
> around this would be a mapping from -m32/-m64 to architecture-specific
> flags inside cc-can-link.sh, similar to what I already did before for
> the mapping of -mlittle-endian to -EL on MIPS. But we'll end up with a
> bunch of architecture-specific details hidden away in a non-generic
> shellscript. And the interactions are very non-obvious and brittle.
> Then I'd rather have the architecture-specific bits openly in proper
> architecture code.
>
> See my current proposal, using x86 as example below. It will require
> code for each architecture, but there are not that many of them.
> And the configuration matrix for each architecture only contains a
> relative small set of actually supported configurations.
> Unfortunately I don't see a generic way to deduplicate the flag values
> between ARCH_CC_CAN_LINK ARCH_USERPROGS_CFLAGS. Each architecture can
> use a macro if they so prefer.
>
> When the "interesting" architectures are done we can also slim down the
> generic implementation to not use any special arguments and that would
> be enough for the simple architectures.
>
> For the future I would like to introduce CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC again.
> With the scheme from below this would mean to duplicate all the kconfig
> symbols for each architecture again. One way around would be to change
> ARCH_CC_CAN_LINK from bool to string. And then let cc-can-link.sh test
> for both static and dynamic linking in one go and return either
> "dynamic,static", "dynamic" or "static" which then can be mapped to
> CC_CAN_LINK and CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC by generic logic.
>
> What do you think?
Yeah this seems like a reasonable direction to start heading. I would
much prefer a little more verbosity for the sake of robustness and
maintainability going forward, especially since these are static flags
per architecture (i.e., once they are initially set, they should not
change).
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index d37dca7850b3..17123948a4fa 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,15 @@ LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --emit-relocs --discard-none
> endif
>
> # Align the bit size of userspace programs with the kernel
> -USERFLAGS_FROM_KERNEL := -m32 -m64 --target=%
> +USERFLAGS_FROM_KERNEL := --target=%
> +
> +ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USERPROGS_CFLAGS
> +KBUILD_USERCFLAGS += $(CONFIG_ARCH_USERPROGS_CFLAGS)
> +KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS += $(CONFIG_ARCH_USERPROGS_CFLAGS)
> +else
> +USERFLAGS_FROM_KERNEL += -m32 -m64
> +endif
> +
> KBUILD_USERCFLAGS += $(filter $(USERFLAGS_FROM_KERNEL), $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS))
> KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS += $(filter $(USERFLAGS_FROM_KERNEL), $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS))
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 75f3de70df51..162c71c117bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ config X86
> select SCHED_SMT if SMP
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER if SMP
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if SMP
> + select ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK
> +
> +config ARCH_CC_CAN_LINK
> + bool
> + default $(cc_can_link_user,-m64) if 64BIT
> + default $(cc_can_link_user,-m32) if !64BIT
> +
> +config ARCH_USERPROGS_CFLAGS
> + string
> + default "-m64" if 64BIT
> + default "-m32" if !64BIT
>
> config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
> def_bool y
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index f3b13463ec26..5ca2f3289020 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -82,8 +82,13 @@ config RUSTC_LLVM_VERSION
> int
> default $(rustc-llvm-version)
>
> +# Might be removed when all architectures are migrated
> +config ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK
> + bool
> +
> config CC_CAN_LINK
> bool
> + default ARCH_CC_CAN_LINK if ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK
> default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/cc-can-link.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(USERCFLAGS) $(USERLDFLAGS) $(m64-flag)) if 64BIT
> default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/cc-can-link.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(USERCFLAGS) $(USERLDFLAGS) $(m32-flag))
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> index 33193ca6e803..0c8dbfbce415 100644
> --- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
> +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> @@ -75,3 +75,6 @@ rustc-llvm-version := $(shell,$(srctree)/scripts/rustc-llvm-version.sh $(RUSTC))
> # If you are testing for unstable features, consider testing RUSTC_VERSION
> # instead, as features may have different completeness while available.
> rustc-option = $(success,trap "rm -rf .tmp_$$" EXIT; mkdir .tmp_$$; $(RUSTC) $(1) --crate-type=rlib /dev/null --out-dir=.tmp_$$ -o .tmp_$$/tmp.rlib)
> +
> +# Test whether the compiler can link userspace applications
> +cc_can_link_user = $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/cc-can-link.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(USERCFLAGS) $(USERLDFLAGS) $(1))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-06 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 5:43 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI from kernel Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-13 5:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: userprogs: avoid duplication of flags inherited " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-13 5:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-27 6:31 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-27 22:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-01 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-03 22:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-07 5:24 ` Nicolas Schier
2025-09-09 5:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-02 13:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-04 19:17 ` Nicolas Schier
2025-10-06 19:13 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-08-14 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Nathan Chancellor
2025-08-15 5:57 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-15 21:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251006191314.GA2706650@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox