From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: dima@arista.com, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gen_init_cpio: Do fsync() only on regular files
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:57:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251007165732.66949558.ddiss@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOSZo8h6l2XNin3C@infradead.org>
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:40:03 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 12:55:03AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> >
> > Here at Arista gen_init_cpio is used in testing in order to create
> > an initramfs for specific tests. Most notably, there is a test that does
> > essentially a fork-bomb in kdump/panic kernel, replacing build-time
> > generated init script: instead of doing makedumpfile, it does call
> > shell tests.
>
> Why is is using fsync at all? Seems like this was added in
>
> commit ae18b94099b04264b32e33b057114024bc72c993
> Author: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
> Date: Tue Aug 19 13:05:45 2025 +1000
>
> gen_init_cpio: support -o <output_file> parameter
>
> without any good explanation. In general doing a per-file fsync
> is going to horrible wreck performance, and given that no one is
> interested in partial initramfs archives also rather pointless.
I should have explained why in the commit, sorry. The intention was to
catch any FS I/O errors during output archive writeback. fsync() is
called only once as the final I/O.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-06 23:55 [PATCH RFC] gen_init_cpio: Do fsync() only on regular files Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
2025-10-07 0:07 ` Dmitry Safonov
2025-10-07 1:17 ` David Disseldorp
2025-10-07 3:09 ` Dmitry Safonov
2025-10-07 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-07 5:57 ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2025-10-07 6:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-07 6:25 ` David Disseldorp
2025-10-07 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251007165732.66949558.ddiss@suse.de \
--to=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox