From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] net: avoid LOCKDEP MAX_LOCK_DEPTH splat
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:54:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251010135412.22602-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
unshare -n bash -c 'for i in $(seq 1 100);do ip link add foo$i type dummy;done'
Gives:
BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
depth: 48 max: 48!
48 locks held by kworker/u16:1/69:
#0: ffff8880010b7148 ((wq_completion)netns){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7ed/0x1350
#1: ffffc900004a7d40 (net_cleanup_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xcf3/0x1350
#2: ffffffff8bc6fbd0 (pernet_ops_rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: cleanup_net+0xab/0x7f0
#3: ffffffff8bc8daa8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: default_device_exit_batch+0x7e/0x2e0
#4: ffff88800b5e9cb0 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x1056/0x1b00
[..]
Work around this by splitting the list into lockdep-digestable sublists.
This patchset should have no effect whatsoever for non-lockdep builds.
This issue is a problem for me because of a recent test case added
to nftables userspace which will create/destroy 100 dummy net devices,
so when I run the tests on a debug kernel lockdep coverage is now lost.
Alternative suggestions welcome.
I did not yet encounter another code path that would take so many mutexes
in a row, so I don't see a reason to muck with task_struct->held_locks[].
Florian Westphal (2):
net: core: move unregister_many inner loops to a helper
net: core: split unregister_netdevice list into smaller chunks
net/core/dev.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.49.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 13:54 Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-10-10 13:54 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: core: move unregister_many inner loops to a helper Florian Westphal
2025-10-10 13:54 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: core: split unregister_netdevice list into smaller chunks Florian Westphal
2025-10-10 22:38 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-10-11 14:30 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251010135412.22602-1-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox