From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f46.google.com (mail-qv1-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C3F237A4F for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760110255; cv=none; b=VTP/FqwgBpfD3neFeOchjhEyFv9lSx3ze8u/MzQmL4ZJWXIiNyqNDhOjCC9Q1nCHNrMCpZc8qANtA81mDMVqI9+q5QSGXIDtCbV5nmUm6AVZ8QP0Ch4ACgb6G8o+2f1zFVOQdSLIiG1oi0hsRa9tfuCMFRrD7LZRZt6nSHvA3gc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760110255; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YweDjybfnRXAUjAFM2cXyTvz7RwWQP0buSdnlIEIdyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Kb8MeS9gpFSLczs/g9NnIsZnrNbsO4nyWv6HyBhhnaD9yNHRkwlehIQ+gg82vJibtAJuGauG1rMLS01e/gz/HraFmyNI33K/TKn8stgS3TFKWx2iLyQAatAzjb/LiHnxWVFZ7O43l1bgHVUqIMgBLb5oTI+RixGn4+HnDX4FeXI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b=DXAUFiAa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="DXAUFiAa" Received: by mail-qv1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-78f75b0a058so22019356d6.0 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:30:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; t=1760110253; x=1760715053; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e6cOfIK7qdN8qKLRMhM71lR4Nf+xbZ2+eVm4l2+34ic=; b=DXAUFiAaDqqCC3+EGPzuTEpjDPpj8TDL6f7/wTX64ElUquDD3fp/hbRxJWl8zAES+j +dnCNkHQplC9wAAKmgxpSmQbvK1W3l0d6pcCSq++3xLlrDG3xBD0z+MBSs7B+lPfBr2e l1b26laUQRZIYyja9N804pvrD3shemyxPsUCsgTZ6G32QXpa0OSVge6fW51lGfultT96 IrSsZkYxbnA14n6CqWaAaRM6YSev8Doda2pH6/bEjAM/CKYqaRvpd0Omt9vmbYOd+IjR 4oE077WohG5cUdFp9gg+ElT6orI4tDRIR5hbzTcsty2mXYEkqL4+4CE5NdzzT1IdtUeW KmxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760110253; x=1760715053; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=e6cOfIK7qdN8qKLRMhM71lR4Nf+xbZ2+eVm4l2+34ic=; b=pt5Pv/LNGG2vz3k41elox11vloKmVVHsUygkm4c+haOUSv7wO2YVFfhkP3cFyOm7f5 IKrNXa2OzZBP4s2tiCUjmKcz5JJGuDQ/UQv/aoBEm/O7EuHgyIe//CoNV9B9tIqHmCNz vCyHzuhIttr+mxF3s3OaqHdqBuGYTz0xrEDvIGPl27YGBb7GRhz2KYrlaD1kIMnrAt+n Fcn1OLVmgEE/3oLfM7IO/0ojCcU+zfL6k9QpG3q4D0Du0ocSFXJJ2R2W4gTSfKd/dkem g+lSlWv9a5idtuTRW3SIyhDnCakZLz8mKkbzEV2py4dIF8A1RPNkMZ/0Mv+UjuQXqLsv zLkA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWuEDMbGO1jD9FrPY74PlBa4198e/BAFEn/inik0BxWY8ddAS/ff01To05/yR8bh4kgRMXbebOy9qEX9/8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YydFISYmwOR/nlijNIOk1Y/OGxyPaGhmHbIKcv+oXMENJ6uF0Vn v3UMcmwQsvh5GxCuKIw/KDb/H8zem/QYJFN/qHPFgqiWN93fbMg18gF4HTx2RAX6O8A= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsyWDvHGRFW2cqEA6YAvMK/GPyp3w5wwmhZOyKlnk+glghn0nxvGTzK66GEr+R GKNwvqxk6EOkHBYpIG0wOVQjxhYWmEBaQVHO4DRGOzxYv4StOB8x7VA56oQm1sU/jC+sWVnnH60 29y6K67PEtiY4f//uSWWZskbArLW3GskgfGF4uQO8Bt5LE6lIhmaQ3Azi+LwU04HKq15RNi6kBL 9AgLLQ8onniLyzZyxdPdqWygSMWdzMbrkdTcTMFgz26RK3bB+gaBU2COlMz5qlmAjUpjaGurDOE ZL3DLNUPskrP56k8w3Us16Vu5gUidpTrLDym8d+nk4YmLs04FnrFykwk8J9lpTcJrp6GweDCZZi LD/BNAMEUwjuKGLhHeahyRWQ0PCWjCoHrOct5cRNZpY/haEC3YAeY1PwOgtjnhYn+foH7GA2hfI 5veGWMrk9SzUc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGgKhRm3oNF4ALMXNjdHTaNK2zfI9rzl46bTecy6J4CNJ6lSFvDvqcPlarS77J3/CcjSy9rWQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c64:b0:830:5c6d:419 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-87b210728c4mr182061246d6.4.1760110247638; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-47-55-120-4.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [47.55.120.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-87bc3570c1esm18187826d6.40.2025.10.10.08.30.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by wakko with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1v7F4w-0000000GWAu-2XWh; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:30:46 -0300 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:30:46 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jeremy Linton Cc: Greg KH , Jonathan Cameron , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Dan Williams , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aik@amd.com, lukas@wunner.de, Samuel Ortiz , Xu Yilun , Suzuki K Poulose , Steven Price , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/38] KVM: arm64: CCA: register host tsm platform device Message-ID: <20251010153046.GF3833649@ziepe.ca> References: <20250728135216.48084-12-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <20250729181045.0000100b@huawei.com> <20250729231948.GJ26511@ziepe.ca> <20250730113827.000032b8@huawei.com> <20250730132333.00006fbf@huawei.com> <2025073035-bulginess-rematch-b92e@gregkh> <20251010135922.GC3833649@ziepe.ca> <4a7d84b2-2ec4-4773-a2d5-7b63d5c683cf@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a7d84b2-2ec4-4773-a2d5-7b63d5c683cf@arm.com> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 10:28:36AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > So you could use auxiliary_device, you'd consider SMC itself to be the > > shared HW block and all the auxiliary drivers are per-subsystem > > aspects of that shared SMC interface. It is not a terrible fit for > > what it was intended for at least. > > Turns out that changing any of this, will at the moment break systemd's > confidential vm detection, because they wanted the earliest indicator the > guest was capable and that turned out to be this platform device. Having systemd detect a software created platform device sounds compltely crazy, don't do that. Make a proper sysfs uapi for such a general idea please. Jason