From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/core 1/1] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcar_pcie_probe+0x13e: no-cfi indirect call!
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:30:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251010223012.GA3597090@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251010074446.GE4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 09:44:46AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That's here... and that is indeed broken. Also note how it zeros r11
> right before calling it.
>
> AFAICT this is:
>
> host->phy_init_fn = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> err = host->phy_init_fn(host);
>
> Where it has decided that of_device_get_match_data() *will* return NULL
> and then helpfully emits (*NULL)(); or something like that. And then
Oh duh because it will :)
$ rg '^(# )?CONFIG_OF' .config
1528:# CONFIG_OF is not set
which means that of_device_get_match_data() is always NULL:
static inline const void *of_device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
{
return NULL;
}
> forgets to add CFI bits on for extra fun and games.
which means this is another instance of what Sami mentioned happening on
another report of a similar issue
https://lore.kernel.org/CABCJKue1wCB6jBLYUc-fAEzpyQWHXwbk8R5GBaZCkCao0EQZPA@mail.gmail.com/
which does somewhat make sense because what's the point of setting up
the CFI call if you know nothing can actually make use of it since we
will crash when trying to indirectly call a NULL pointer?
Something like this would avoid this issue then.
Cheers,
Nathan
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
index 213028052aa5..15514c9c1927 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int rcar_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_clk_disable;
host->phy_init_fn = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
- err = host->phy_init_fn(host);
+ err = host->phy_init_fn ? host->phy_init_fn(host) : -ENODEV;
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to init PCIe PHY\n");
goto err_clk_disable;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 13:07 [tip:x86/core 1/1] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcar_pcie_probe+0x13e: no-cfi indirect call! kernel test robot
2025-10-10 3:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-10 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-10 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-10 22:30 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-10-10 22:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-10-13 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-13 18:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-13 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-13 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251010223012.GA3597090@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox