public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] fix invalid sleeping in detect_cache_attributes()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:45:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025101512-overlap-maggot-441c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025101509-bucktooth-reawake-5176@gregkh>

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:27:25AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
> > commit 3fcbf1c77d08 ("arch_topology: Fix cache attributes detection
> > in the CPU hotplug path")
> > adds a call to detect_cache_attributes() to populate the cacheinfo
> > before updating the siblings mask. detect_cache_attributes() allocates
> > memory and can take the PPTT mutex (on ACPI platforms). On PREEMPT_RT
> > kernels, on secondary CPUs, this triggers a:
> >   'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context'
> > as the code is executed with preemption and interrupts disabled:
> > 
> >  | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
> >  | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/111
> >  | preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> >  | RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
> >  | 3 locks held by swapper/111/0:
> >  |  #0:  (&pcp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: get_page_from_freelist+0x218/0x12c8
> >  |  #1:  (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rt_spin_trylock+0x48/0xf0
> >  |  #2:  (&zone->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0x64/0xa80
> >  | irq event stamp: 0
> >  | hardirqs last  enabled at (0):  0x0
> >  | hardirqs last disabled at (0):  copy_process+0x5dc/0x1ab8
> >  | softirqs last  enabled at (0):  copy_process+0x5dc/0x1ab8
> >  | softirqs last disabled at (0):  0x0
> >  | Preemption disabled at:
> >  |  migrate_enable+0x30/0x130
> >  | CPU: 111 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/111 Tainted: G        W          6.0.0-rc4-rt6-[...]
> >  | Call trace:
> >  |  __kmalloc+0xbc/0x1e8
> >  |  detect_cache_attributes+0x2d4/0x5f0
> >  |  update_siblings_masks+0x30/0x368
> >  |  store_cpu_topology+0x78/0xb8
> >  |  secondary_start_kernel+0xd0/0x198
> >  |  __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4
> > 
> > 
> > Pierre fixed this issue in the upstream 6.3 and the original series is follows:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/167404285593.885445.6219705651301997538.b4-ty@arm.com/
> > 
> > We also encountered the same issue on 6.1 stable branch,  and need to backport this series.
> > 
> > Pierre Gondois (6):
> >   cacheinfo: Use RISC-V's init_cache_level() as generic OF
> >     implementation
> >   cacheinfo: Return error code in init_of_cache_level()
> >   cacheinfo: Check 'cache-unified' property to count cache leaves
> >   ACPI: PPTT: Remove acpi_find_cache_levels()
> >   ACPI: PPTT: Update acpi_find_last_cache_level() to
> >     acpi_get_cache_info()
> >   arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU
> 
> This series seems to have broken existing systems, as reported here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/046f08cb-0610-48c9-af24-4804367df177@nvidia.com
> 
> so I'm going to drop it from the queue at this point in time.  Please
> work to resolve this before resubmitting it.

Also note that there was a non-trivial number of follow-on fixes for
patches in this series that I had to backport to the tree as well.
When/if you resubmit this, please also include all of those fixes also.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-15  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-30 17:27 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] fix invalid sleeping in detect_cache_attributes() Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 1/6] cacheinfo: Use RISC-V's init_cache_level() as generic OF implementation Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 2/6] cacheinfo: Return error code in init_of_cache_level() Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 3/6] cacheinfo: Check 'cache-unified' property to count cache leaves Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 4/6] ACPI: PPTT: Remove acpi_find_cache_levels() Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 5/6] ACPI: PPTT: Update acpi_find_last_cache_level() to acpi_get_cache_info() Wen Yang
2025-09-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU Wen Yang
2025-10-15  8:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] fix invalid sleeping in detect_cache_attributes() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-15  8:45   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-10-15 17:23   ` Wen Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025101512-overlap-maggot-441c@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox