From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, craftfever <craftfever@airmail.cc>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ksm: use range-walk function to jump over holes in scan_get_next_rmap_item
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:07:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251016140735.d7d4c282f0fbf22954a4b4ee@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016012236.4189-1-pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 22:22:36 -0300 Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently, scan_get_next_rmap_item() walks every page address in a VMA
> to locate mergeable pages. This becomes highly inefficient when scanning
> large virtual memory areas that contain mostly unmapped regions.
>
> This patch replaces the per-address lookup with a range walk using
> walk_page_range(). The range walker allows KSM to skip over entire
> unmapped holes in a VMA, avoiding unnecessary lookups.
> This problem was previously discussed in [1].
>
> ...
>
> Reported-by: craftfever <craftfever@airmail.cc>
> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/020cf8de6e773bb78ba7614ef250129f11a63781@murena.io
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>
Is Fixes: b1d3e9bbccb4 ("mm/ksm: convert scan_get_next_rmap_item() from
follow_page() to folio_walk") appropriate?
The problem which is being addressed seems pretty serious. What do
people think about proposing a -stable backport of this fix?
It would be better if this changelog were to describe the user-visible
effects of the problem. A copy-n-paste from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220599 would suffice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 1:22 [PATCH v3] ksm: use range-walk function to jump over holes in scan_get_next_rmap_item Pedro Demarchi Gomes
2025-10-16 19:35 ` craftfever
2025-10-16 21:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-10-16 21:33 ` craftfever
2025-10-16 21:54 ` craftfever
2025-10-20 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 15:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 22:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-18 7:30 ` craftfever
2025-10-20 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21 3:00 ` Pedro Demarchi Gomes
2025-10-21 15:25 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251016140735.d7d4c282f0fbf22954a4b4ee@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=craftfever@airmail.cc \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox