Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] x86/acpi: Add helper functions to setup and access the wakeup mailbox

[Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:46:59AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 4:48 AM Ricardo Neri
> <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > In preparation to move the functionality to wake secondary CPUs up from the
> > ACPI code, add two helper functions.
> >
> > The function acpi_setup_mp_wakeup_mailbox() stores the physical address of
> > the mailbox and updates the wakeup_secondary_cpu_64() APIC callback.
> >
> > There is a slight change in behavior: now the APIC callback is updated
> > before configuring CPU hotplug offline behavior. This is fine as the APIC
> > callback continues to be updated unconditionally, regardless of the
> > restriction on CPU offlining.
> >
> > The function acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup_mailbox() returns a pointer to the
> > mailbox. Use this helper function only in the portions of the code for
> > which the variable acpi_mp_wake_mailbox will be out of scope once it is
> > relocated out of the ACPI directory.
> >
> > The wakeup mailbox is only supported for CONFIG_X86_64 and needed only with
> > CONFIG_SMP=y.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> This should have been
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The "(Intel)" part is missing and I omitted it when I sent the tag.
> Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks for the clarification Rafael. Does this clarification apply also
patches 2 and 3?

Also, if no further changes are needed in the series, can it be corrected
when the patches are merged?