From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 02/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:24:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251022112432.GN4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcb09e14-970c-4ebd-82f2-a12150fe3708@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:12:14PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> Just think twice about this fix, it seems current fix is incomplete.
> Besides the PEBS handler, the basic PMI handler could encounter same issue,
> like the below code in handle_pmi_common(),
>
> for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
> u64 last_period;
>
> handled++;
>
> if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
> continue;
>
> Although the NULL event would not be accessed by checking
> the cpuc->active_mask, the potential overflow process of these NULL events
> is skipped as well, it may cause data loss.
>
> Moreover, current approach defines temporary variables to snapshot the
> active events, the temporary variables may consume too much stack memory
> (384 bytes).
>
> So I enhance the fix as below. Do you have any comment on this? Thanks.
So I didn't like the previous and I like this even less. What about
something like this instead?
I quickly went through the cpuc->event[ users and they all either check
active_mask or, in case of the PEBS stuff, check pebs_enabled mask
(which should be a subset of active_mask).
(the PEBS last case depends on count being 0 for all counters that are
not set in pebs_enabled)
WDYT?
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 745caa6c15a3..74479f9d6eed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1344,6 +1344,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_ARCH;
x86_pmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
+ cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = NULL;
}
/*
@@ -1365,6 +1366,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* if cpuc->enabled = 0, then no wrmsr as
* per x86_pmu_enable_event()
*/
+ cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = event;
x86_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
}
cpuc->n_added = 0;
@@ -1531,7 +1533,6 @@ static void x86_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
event->hw.state = 0;
- cpuc->events[idx] = event;
__set_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
static_call(x86_pmu_enable)(event);
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
@@ -1610,7 +1611,6 @@ void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
if (test_bit(hwc->idx, cpuc->active_mask)) {
static_call(x86_pmu_disable)(event);
__clear_bit(hwc->idx, cpuc->active_mask);
- cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = NULL;
WARN_ON_ONCE(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
}
@@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
* Not a TXN, therefore cleanup properly.
*/
x86_pmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
+ cpuc->events[event->hw.idx] = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {
if (event == cpuc->event_list[i])
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 6:44 [Patch v8 00/12] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 01/12] perf/x86: Remove redundant is_x86_event() prototype Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 02/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss Dapeng Mi
2025-10-22 8:12 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-22 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-10-23 2:29 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 05/12] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-10-21 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 5:27 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 06/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-10-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 5:32 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-22 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-23 1:06 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 07/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group " Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 09/12] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 10/12] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 11/12] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-10-15 6:44 ` [Patch v8 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251022112432.GN4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox