From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] printk_legacy_map: use LD_WAIT_CONFIG instead of LD_WAIT_SLEEP
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:41:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251022154115.GA22400@redhat.com> (raw)
printk_legacy_map is used on !PREEMPT_RT to avoid false positives from
CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING about raw_spinlock/spinlock nesting.
However, LD_WAIT_SLEEP is not exactly right; it fools lockdep as if it
is fine to acquire a sleeping lock.
Change DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(printk_legacy_map) to use LD_WAIT_CONFIG.
(We can also make printk_legacy_allow_spinlock_enter/exit() depend on
!PREEMPT_RT && CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING)
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 5aee9ffb16b9..f11b2f31999b 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3007,7 +3007,7 @@ bool printk_get_next_message(struct printk_message *pmsg, u64 seq,
* false positive. For PREEMPT_RT the false positive condition does not
* occur.
*
- * This map is used to temporarily establish LD_WAIT_SLEEP context for the
+ * This map is used to temporarily establish LD_WAIT_CONFIG context for the
* console write() callback when legacy printing to avoid false positive
* lockdep complaints, thus allowing lockdep to continue to function for
* real issues.
@@ -3016,7 +3016,7 @@ bool printk_get_next_message(struct printk_message *pmsg, u64 seq,
static inline void printk_legacy_allow_spinlock_enter(void) { }
static inline void printk_legacy_allow_spinlock_exit(void) { }
#else
-static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(printk_legacy_map, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
+static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(printk_legacy_map, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
static inline void printk_legacy_allow_spinlock_enter(void)
{
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 15:41 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-10-23 7:49 ` [PATCH] printk_legacy_map: use LD_WAIT_CONFIG instead of LD_WAIT_SLEEP Petr Mladek
2025-10-23 8:58 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 10:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 9:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-23 15:06 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 15:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-23 15:46 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 19:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-24 9:35 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-24 10:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-24 12:57 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-24 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-24 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-24 10:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-24 11:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251022154115.GA22400@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).