linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	 David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 2/4] net: devmem: refactor sock_devmem_dontneed for autorelease split
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:58:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v5-2-47cb85f5259e@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v5-0-47cb85f5259e@meta.com>

From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>

Refactor sock_devmem_dontneed() in preparation for supporting both
autorelease and manual token release modes.

Split the function into two parts:
- sock_devmem_dontneed(): handles input validation, token allocation,
  and copying from userspace
- sock_devmem_dontneed_autorelease(): performs the actual token release
  via xarray lookup and page pool put

This separation allows a future commit to add a parallel
sock_devmem_dontneed_manual_release() function that uses a different
token tracking mechanism (per-niov reference counting) without
duplicating the input validation logic.

The refactoring is purely mechanical with no functional change. Only
intended to minimize the noise in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
---
 net/core/sock.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index a99132cc0965..e7b378753763 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1082,30 +1082,13 @@ static int sock_reserve_memory(struct sock *sk, int bytes)
 #define MAX_DONTNEED_FRAGS 1024
 
 static noinline_for_stack int
-sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
+sock_devmem_dontneed_autorelease(struct sock *sk, struct dmabuf_token *tokens,
+				 unsigned int num_tokens)
 {
-	unsigned int num_tokens, i, j, k, netmem_num = 0;
-	struct dmabuf_token *tokens;
+	unsigned int i, j, k, netmem_num = 0;
 	int ret = 0, num_frags = 0;
 	netmem_ref netmems[16];
 
-	if (!sk_is_tcp(sk))
-		return -EBADF;
-
-	if (optlen % sizeof(*tokens) ||
-	    optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(*tokens);
-	tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!tokens)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) {
-		kvfree(tokens);
-		return -EFAULT;
-	}
-
 	xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags);
 	for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) {
@@ -1135,6 +1118,35 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
 	for (k = 0; k < netmem_num; k++)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!napi_pp_put_page(netmems[k]));
 
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static noinline_for_stack int
+sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	struct dmabuf_token *tokens;
+	unsigned int num_tokens;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!sk_is_tcp(sk))
+		return -EBADF;
+
+	if (optlen % sizeof(*tokens) ||
+	    optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(*tokens);
+	tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tokens)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) {
+		kvfree(tokens);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	ret = sock_devmem_dontneed_autorelease(sk, tokens, num_tokens);
+
 	kvfree(tokens);
 	return ret;
 }

-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-23 20:58 [PATCH net-next v5 0/4] net: devmem: improve cpu cost of RX token management Bobby Eshleman
2025-10-23 20:58 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/4] net: devmem: rename tx_vec to vec in dmabuf binding Bobby Eshleman
2025-10-23 20:58 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
2025-10-23 20:58 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/4] net: devmem: use niov array for token management Bobby Eshleman
2025-10-23 20:58 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] net: add per-netns sysctl for devmem autorelease Bobby Eshleman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251023-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v5-2-47cb85f5259e@meta.com \
    --to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).