From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B09421ABB1 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761234505; cv=none; b=dYl14qJwUrOkL4239goqKaPQ86HTG8gAgJRqh4Fj7iRfIKInoo3vIig4M7D0nyUmxPx0q6WCA+fYfOnUnKzBoHkOgurEYjdzMPmAs0ByTc7uC633VMWgFtR/KSAP245oTH1WzAkWlMVzmH3tWNZryt/P+ivVVZpl4oWprr1oV/s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761234505; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DtBrMovIMi8nkW6mvl87BBEZBuBwT/3dCBDkaoO3tw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D6jrsw6AKPMQsKm4TuA+v2x31I/mQfVBBPYD846sJIfCffZQnSpH748op0FZnaG4Ar/QktfycLC8R9ntNk7GmccjYgA8aE8leMTEMjQ2V/Gd9rg3fBae+dfAxx1YSKuEKiGdD0Vojgvmurdoh9qxinP+m+36GQkw6dEEo2nSyLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dVOF+WDj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dVOF+WDj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761234503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DtBrMovIMi8nkW6mvl87BBEZBuBwT/3dCBDkaoO3tw0=; b=dVOF+WDjh7RnRcuP8eobYmNUED2KcbNDr5CEcCrg7jh2Q9YqhRpZ/mkavzxcLKNO33/0WB uc3XD9UztPDG9GpGM74RbKyw0SzDYukd8mb7q6Sa4FOZnT1SBAeX1G9qS5y5ngieQ/5xlz gHI9l3ZVcDQgyowj6QmLs4itPbOxzp0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-186-MPGkyEJZMMGRzlK5bDEXgg-1; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:48:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MPGkyEJZMMGRzlK5bDEXgg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: MPGkyEJZMMGRzlK5bDEXgg_1761234500 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072EF18001DD; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.19]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2831C180057C; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 17:47:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 17:46:58 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: John Ogness , Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk_legacy_map: use LD_WAIT_CONFIG instead of LD_WAIT_SLEEP Message-ID: <20251023154657.GD26461@redhat.com> References: <20251022154115.GA22400@redhat.com> <20251023103234.GA27415@redhat.com> <20251023142655.FvZkeSa-@linutronix.de> <87wm4lbqt2.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> <20251023151112.goqBFQcM@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251023151112.goqBFQcM@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Again, quite possibly I am wrong. please see my reply in another thread, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251023152942.GC26461@redhat.com/ On 10/23, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > This does not matter. My point is that there no need for this ifdefery. I disagree. Rightly or not. To me this ifdefery in printk.c make the intent more clear. I am still thinking about the possible cleanup of the current usage of DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(), but I think that, whatever we do, this cleanup should take CONFIG_RT into account. Oleg.