public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@hotmail.com>
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	jroedel@suse.de, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/amd: Set C-bit only for RAM-backed PTEs in IOMMU page tables
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:54 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023160154.GM262900@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SI2PR01MB439358422CCAABADBEB21D7CDCF0A@SI2PR01MB4393.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:15:43PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> When SME is enabled, iommu_v1_map_pages() currently sets the C-bit for
> all physical addresses. This is correct for RAM, since the C-bit is
> required by SME to indicate encrypted memory and ensure proper
> encryption/decryption.
> 
> However, applying the C-bit to MMIO addresses is incorrect. Devices and
> PCIe switches do not interpret the C-bit currently, and doing so can break
> PCIe peer-to-peer communication. To avoid this, only set the C-bit when
> the physical address is backed by RAM, and leave MMIO mappings unchanged.
> 
> Fixes: 2543a786aa25 ("iommu/amd: Allow the AMD IOMMU to work with memory encryption")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@hotmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c
> index 70c2f5b1631b..6f395940d0a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/io_pgtable.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,9 @@ static int iommu_v1_map_pages(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,
>  	if (!(prot & IOMMU_PROT_MASK))
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	if (sme_me_mask && page_is_ram(PHYS_PFN(paddr)))
> +		paddr = __sme_set(paddr);

It needs to use the IOMMU_MMIO flag not page_is_ram, which I think got
mangled by the time it reached here..

Though broadly this points to a larger problem, the iommu domain code
should not be trying to guess if a mapping is private or not, this
needs to be passed in from higher level code which knows what state
the PFN is..

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-23 15:15 [PATCH v1] iommu/amd: Set C-bit only for RAM-backed PTEs in IOMMU page tables Wei Wang
2025-10-23 16:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-24  3:05   ` Wei Wang
2025-10-24 11:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-24 14:23       ` Wei Wang
2025-10-24 14:34         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251023160154.GM262900@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox