From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F093318146; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761237437; cv=none; b=kT0Gg2WfYySe8Q/KYoStV4kBcltnKvs50mC7F0iWQ8oDFTlMhDSdBZGb+/UNMfbuVprpA8+d1kPh6SYjpEUxetPS/VWzx2LPQrrgC8xnDNPoPXWKTXNFEIlTMjhxQ1k64s+J7VLN47X/VOW9Vsc4g2gY+UpdBDRXBSS+Fdx4xsg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761237437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fPR0A01Xt9xlltL6y+4pP219bRRj+j6TLOgZvaLWer0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AbbwksZ9oHIxgZyAgCch9tmNULOFStD325gLLq6JgMppN6akrt242bPi8HF37xQHmjBmJ5zAJ8DUQXMEyttS5rhlNWK7zkJryql48pZNvsKMr/vtBGKxByLs1nn9lvqSnlSmKnG8P9Rnz6U8pDc+fOSV+Wg4tU4T8fdRR5az0Os= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZBHR4u5E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZBHR4u5E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AB70C4CEE7; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:37:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761237436; bh=fPR0A01Xt9xlltL6y+4pP219bRRj+j6TLOgZvaLWer0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZBHR4u5EeKjLUjrJVTn5NHF9cn8ehBUTAAnZaYi38EcdmbeDVwmnYEqRcif0ALu++ DIrylP8E4XhlNUyOJRUhk03dkabN5SBCjAsU+/p+mMQFza2LEF0WM9QnLfYuSXNal0 FxTjY63y+oGGScHjwA0n/LghHiTVcmB58z1BYSRtnaLuE/ZG26rUWqSEKNo7OdoCkk oNUNt80IqAMemEKTb22NwzWjAtC06Shg5m3LBGZaFfhZTYhgL4sHqI426BCKYf5uiq sdJM2uhZst/kwff5JiAxIP3NXsJocR8DCdJWcGZ1pXVfDks6rjAW7qvdfRpuo3eW/z cI3Qw4b/b9h8g== Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 18:37:11 +0200 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Kees Cook , Sami Tolvanen , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Remove i2c_dw_remove_lock_support() Message-ID: <20251023163711.GA2090923@ax162> References: <20251013-dw_i2c_plat_remove-avoid-objtool-no-cfi-warning-v1-1-8cc4842967bf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 09:29:02AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Have you seen this attempt to refactor a bit that code? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20231207141653.2785124-7-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ No, I did not. I did not look at historical attempts to fix this issue since it was still present in -next. Cheers, Nathan