From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, lkft@linaro.org, arnd@kernel.org,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, jack@suse.cz, brauner@kernel.org,
chrubis@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
aalbersh@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
benjamin.copeland@linaro.org, andrea.cervesato@suse.com,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ioctl_pidfd05: accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:15:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024081556.GA570960@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADYN=9J1xAgctUqwptD5C3Ss9aJZvZQ2ep=Ck2zP6X+ZrKe81Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 18:44, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when
> > invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the
> > test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure
> > compatibility across different kernel versions.
I dared to add a commit which caused the change (found by Cyril Hrubis):
3c17001b21b9f ("pidfs: validate extensible ioctls")
and merged!
Thanks for fix and review!
Kind regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 16:44 [PATCH v2] ioctl_pidfd05: accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-23 19:20 ` Anders Roxell
2025-10-24 8:15 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-10-23 20:02 ` [LTP] " Avinesh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251024081556.GA570960@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.copeland@linaro.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox