From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Suppress false DEBUG_PREEMPT warning in smp_call_on_cpu()
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024140832.46JNLRvL@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024070714.4047816-1-namcao@linutronix.de>
On 2025-10-24 09:07:14 [+0200], Nam Cao wrote:
> While booting UP (uniprocessor) kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y, the
> following warning is observed:
>
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
> caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x28
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc2-00012-g002733e953a7 #111 PREEMPT_RT
> Hardware name: MangoPi MQ Pro (DT)
> Call Trace:
> dump_backtrace
> show_stack
> dump_stack_lvl
> dump_stack
> check_preemption_disabled.isra.0
> debug_smp_processor_id
> check_unaligned_access
> smp_call_on_cpu
> check_unaligned_access_all_cpus
> do_one_initcall
> kernel_init_freeable
> kernel_init
> ret_from_fork_kernel
> ret_from_fork_kernel_asm
Can be compressed to:
Using smp_processor_id() in a smp_call_on_cpu() callback triggers a
"using ... in preemptible" warning in UP builds.
> This is a false warning. The UP-variant of smp_call_on_cpu() simply calls
> the callback, and thus debug_smp_processor_id() thinks the context is
> unsafe for smp_processor_id(), which is obviously false because this is UP
> kernel.
"Only the UP implementation is affected by this"
> This appears after commit 06ddd17521bf ("sched/smp: Always define
> is_percpu_thread() and scheduler_ipi()"). Before this commit,
> is_percpu_thread() always returns true on UP kernel and thus
> debug_smp_processor_id() always sees a per-cpu thread and never warns. But
> now is_percpu_thread() returns false for this case.
>
> Suppress this warning with a migrate_disable()+migrate_enable() pair.
Right. This is one of the possibilities. The other one would be to also
workqueue on UP and preserve the same semantic.
I don't mind this.
> Fixes: 06ddd17521bf ("sched/smp: Always define is_percpu_thread() and scheduler_ipi()")
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> grep shows me that the followings also have the same false warning:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
> drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c
> drivers/platform/x86/dell/dcdbas.c
> kernel/watchdog.c
> ---
> kernel/up.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/up.c b/kernel/up.c
> index df50828cc2f0..37c9f0d39b36 100644
> --- a/kernel/up.c
> +++ b/kernel/up.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,14 @@ int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int (*func)(void *), void *par, bool phys)
>
> if (phys)
> hypervisor_pin_vcpu(0);
> +
> + /* suppress warnings from debug_smp_processor_id() */
If you want to add a comment, what about something like
/* Preserve not being migratable such as SMP variant does */
> + migrate_disable();
> +
> ret = func(par);
> +
> + migrate_enable();
> +
> if (phys)
> hypervisor_pin_vcpu(-1);
>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 7:07 [PATCH] smp: Suppress false DEBUG_PREEMPT warning in smp_call_on_cpu() Nam Cao
2025-10-24 14:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-11-05 8:42 ` Nam Cao
2025-11-05 8:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251024140832.46JNLRvL@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox