public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>
To: Steffen Jaeckel <sjaeckel@suse.de>
Cc: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>,
	dima.ruinskiy@intel.com, Mikael Wessel <post@mikaelkw.online>,
	Mor Bar-Gabay <morx.bar.gabay@intel.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: CVE-2025-39898: e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:26:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025102432-motive-passage-eacf@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db92fcc8-114d-4e85-9d15-7860545bc65e@suse.de>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 12:53:44PM +0200, Steffen Jaeckel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 2025-10-01 09:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Description
> > ===========
> > 
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> > 
> > e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom
> > 
> > Fix a possible heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom function by adding
> > input validation for the requested length of the change in the EEPROM.
> > In addition, change the variable type from int to size_t for better
> > code practices and rearrange declarations to RCT.
> > 
> > The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-39898 to this issue.
> > 
> > 
> > Affected and fixed versions
> > ===========================
> > 
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.4.299 with commit ea832ec0583e2398ea0c5ed8d902c923e16f53c4
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.10.243 with commit ce8829d3d44b8622741bccca9f4408bc3da30b2b
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.15.192 with commit 99a8772611e2d7ec318be7f0f072037914a1f509
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.1.151 with commit b48adcacc34fbbc49046a7ee8a97839bef369c85
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.6.105 with commit 50a84d5c814039ad2abe2748aec3e89324a548a7
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.12.46 with commit b370f7b1f470a8d5485cc1e40e8ff663bb55d712
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.16.6 with commit 0aec3211283482cfcdd606d1345e1f9acbcabd31
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.17 with commit 90fb7db49c6dbac961c6b8ebfd741141ffbc8545
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> we believe that this CVE is invalid since the sole caller is
> `net/ethtool/ioctl.c:ethtool_set_eeprom()`, which already does all the
> necessary checks before invoking a driver specific implementation.

Great, will this commit then be reverted?  I'll go revoke this cve now,
thanks for the review.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2025100116-CVE-2025-39898-d844@gregkh>
2025-10-24 10:53 ` CVE-2025-39898: e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom Steffen Jaeckel
2025-10-24 11:26   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-10-24 17:04     ` Tony Nguyen
2025-10-24 12:27   ` David Laight
2025-10-24 12:40     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-24 14:11       ` David Laight
2025-10-27 21:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-28 18:14     ` Tony Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025102432-motive-passage-eacf@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=cve@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morx.bar.gabay@intel.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=post@mikaelkw.online \
    --cc=sjaeckel@suse.de \
    --cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox