public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 3/4] bpf: Free special fields when update local storage maps
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 23:39:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251026154000.34151-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251026154000.34151-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

When updating local storage maps with BPF_F_LOCK on the fast path, the
special fields were not freed after being replaced. This could cause
memory referenced by BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU} fields to be held until the
map gets freed.

Similarly, on the other path, the old sdata's special fields were never
freed regardless of whether BPF_F_LOCK was used, causing the same issue.

Fix this by calling 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' after
'copy_map_value_locked()' to properly release the old fields.

Fixes: 9db44fdd8105 ("bpf: Support kptrs in local storage maps")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index b931fbceb54da..8e3aea4e07c50 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 		if (old_sdata && selem_linked_to_storage_lockless(SELEM(old_sdata))) {
 			copy_map_value_locked(&smap->map, old_sdata->data,
 					      value, false);
+			bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, old_sdata->data);
 			return old_sdata;
 		}
 	}
@@ -641,6 +642,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 	if (old_sdata && (map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK)) {
 		copy_map_value_locked(&smap->map, old_sdata->data, value,
 				      false);
+		bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, old_sdata->data);
 		selem = SELEM(old_sdata);
 		goto unlock;
 	}
@@ -654,6 +656,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 
 	/* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */
 	if (old_sdata) {
+		bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, old_sdata->data);
 		bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata));
 		bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata),
 						true, &old_selem_free_list);
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-26 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-26 15:39 [PATCH bpf v3 0/4] bpf: Free special fields when update hash and local storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-10-26 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/4] bpf: Free special fields when update [lru_,]percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-10-28 18:03   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-26 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/4] bpf: Free special fields when update hash maps with BPF_F_LOCK Leon Hwang
2025-10-26 15:39 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-10-27 15:44   ` [PATCH bpf v3 3/4] bpf: Free special fields when update local storage maps Amery Hung
2025-10-27 16:15     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-27 17:04       ` Amery Hung
2025-10-28 14:48         ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-28 18:03           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-26 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify freeing the special fields when update hash and " Leon Hwang
2025-10-27 16:34   ` Amery Hung
2025-10-29 14:58     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-30 14:29       ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-28 18:10 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/4] bpf: Free " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-10-28 20:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-29  6:49     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-29  6:57       ` Menglong Dong
2025-10-29 16:38       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-30  5:37         ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251026154000.34151-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox