[PATCH v3 1/1] checkpatch: Don't warn on "orhapned" DT schema file

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

Currently checkpatch warns is the DT schema file is absent in MAINTAINERS.
However the DT schema files are self-contained in this sense and
have embedded information about maintainers of it. This is a requirement.
Hence, avoid checkpatch warning about it.

Tested-by: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---

v3: removed Requested-by tag
v2: drop some leftovers


The motivation of the patch is that DT people complaining about checkpatch but
doing nothing about it. They should be more collaborative.

 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 6729f18e5654..db274a7c2fb0 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3441,9 +3441,12 @@ sub process {
 		     ($line =~ /\{\s*([\w\/\.\-]*)\s*\=\>\s*([\w\/\.\-]*)\s*\}/ &&
 		      (defined($1) || defined($2))))) {
 			$is_patch = 1;
-			$reported_maintainer_file = 1;
-			WARN("FILE_PATH_CHANGES",
-			     "added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?\n" . $herecurr);
+			# DT bindings are incorporate maintainer information, no need to report
+			if ($realfile !~ m@^Documentation/devicetree/bindings/@)) {
+				$reported_maintainer_file = 1;
+				WARN("FILE_PATH_CHANGES",
+				     "added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?\n" . $herecurr);
+			}
 		}
 
 # Check for adding new DT bindings not in schema format
-- 
2.50.1