public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
	Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: drop bogus nid quirk for multipath devices which passed id test
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:59:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029095907.GA1652@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd91a6c1-cefc-43e2-8dd8-48b7ea241ded@flourine.local>

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 08:44:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > But more imporantly dropping the quirk for multipath devices is
> > fundamentally the wrong thing to do, as we really need proper IDs for
> > multipathing. So just add another entry for the Dell device using
> > the dell subvendor/subdevice id that does not have the quirk.
> 
> The problem it is not possible to distinguish between the two devices
> based on subvendor/subdevice ids. I've tried to find some way to keep
> those two devices apart, serial numbers but I don't think there is
> something usable. Thus the idea to rely our own sanity checks and
> enable the feature if these pass. 

The problem is that there is no such thing as a sanity check.  Otherwise
life would be easy.  But I really can't believe that Dell is incompetent
enough to not leave a mark of their OEM Firmware version anywhere.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-29  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28 12:54 [PATCH] nvme: drop bogus nid quirk for multipath devices which passed id test Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29  7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-29  9:45   ` Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29  9:59     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-10-29 10:14       ` Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29 13:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05  7:33 ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251029095907.GA1652@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=wagi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox