From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m49248.qiye.163.com (mail-m49248.qiye.163.com [45.254.49.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7567334D3B1; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 04:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.254.49.248 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761886413; cv=none; b=TMVfaaZ3vzuK8iV8oxHaiBzguIfITzBH2+ihzgi9h9qUw8eMoUSNci7/JdDHISq+mZM1WH8v8a7G039ZXRq36pkc+iOy8iBbKP6dsM2BW9aA8WONBDyndW0yuUi/u5F7WWM+iUlRpVCFKcHpJITq9m3+l59B0yeCRKtlOOmzHz8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761886413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9D7MMPkSZhjVq6hlRBDYzlOjp+CnuCQUDvEFL+xDQDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qTClg2bLi2indiVv+L9WlAyYH2+5RYZqjZOHkhlFaw8E1OZkFl9G+6u9CF5ukFMWwikYIrtcq4/Btecc4tX7baroXeErmQ8J4gSRB7ipExXBpQ5+O7NDC0XPhws0plTW+BBTlHyz/J9gqvstuv6mNOUFsW0LZaVvu7pQxGXxuxo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b=PzPRPL23; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.254.49.248 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b="PzPRPL23" Received: from albert-OptiPlex-7080.. (unknown [117.184.129.134]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 27deeccb5; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:38:04 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: Albert Yang To: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Cc: arnd@arndb.de, bst-upstream@bstai.top, catalin.marinas@arm.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, gordon.ge@bst.ai, krzk+dt@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, yangzh0906@thundersoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: introduce Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC and CDCU1.0 board Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:38:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20251031043803.781326-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a9a388ef3c409cckunm404592c761173f X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlCTx8dVhhKTktMGEhOQkkeSlYVFAkWGhdVEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlKSkxVSkNPVUpJQlVKSE9ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpLSU9PT0hVSk tLVUpCS0tZBg++ DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=PzPRPL2310JdW9Re2Ybec0cHbMyoSiSGnUFWbjShL8juQ+2rLnAysUg4vxiKlzYnnPFSIU1Cf3pMuQtwf89uvvnrQwjXuMo5UdYlbANEA72XI6xtF+GGTZoJg2fQ3E3kDLfc/PaFc5yeYASHK87cauI0n5KzVETc1gzQ7CqLZ6o=; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=thundersoft.com; v=1; bh=9D7MMPkSZhjVq6hlRBDYzlOjp+CnuCQUDvEFL+xDQDI=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/10/2025 12:40, Albert Yang wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > Gentle ping on this series. It's been two weeks since v5 was posted. > > > > This version addresses the DTS coding style and property ordering issues > > from our previous discussion [1]. Following Arnd's suggestion [2], the MMC > > patches have been removed and will be submitted separately. > > > > Patch 2/6 (arm bindings) already has your Reviewed-by. The remaining > > patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig, and MAINTAINERS) are ready for review > > when you have time. > > I don't understand this ping. You received the reviewed from me or other > maintainers, where we were responsible to give such review. Probably you > assume that my job is to review something else here, but sorry, that's > not my job at the time of this patchset was prepared (we don't count > here recent changes because that would mean you ping me after few days...). > My apologies for the confusion. You're absolutely right about the maintainer responsibilities. I should clarify why I pinged you: You provided valuable feedback on earlier versions of this series, including the DTS patches. Since those changes were made based on your input but hadn't received confirmation, I wanted to make sure they properly addressed your concerns. However, I now understand that the SoC-specific patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig, MAINTAINERS) should be reviewed by the ARM SoC maintainers. Thank you for your reviews and for clarifying the proper process. I'll follow up with Arnd for the remaining patches. Best regards, Albert