From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tools/nolibc: use a custom struct timespec
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:40:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251102084039.GC10797@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251102083622.GB10797@1wt.eu>
On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 09:36:22AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 03:46:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025, at 17:02, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > >
> > > +struct timespec {
> > > + time_t tv_sec;
> > > + long tv_nsec;
> > > +};
> > > +#define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/time.h>
> >
> > Unfortunately this is not the definition we want on big-endian
> > systems because it puts the tv_nsec field in the wrong place.
>
> Indeed!
>
> > You can either uses the simple (non-POSIX) __kernel_timespec
> > definition in nolibc with a 64-bit tv_nsec, or copy the more
> > complicated definition with explicit padding that is used
> > in musl and glibc.
>
> I think that switching this patch and the next one (10/12) would
> just do the trick since both fields will become __kernel_time64_t.
> Or maybe the two should be squashed into a single one.
OK like Arnd, I just saw with the last commit that this one will not
harm. That's good.
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-02 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 16:02 [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit ino_t, off_t and time-related types Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/12] tools/nolibc: use 64-bit ino_t Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/12] tools/nolibc: handle 64-bit off_t for llseek Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/12] tools/nolibc: prefer the llseek syscall Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/12] tools/nolibc: use 64-bit off_t Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/12] tools/nolibc: remove now superfluous overflow check in llseek Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/12] tools/nolibc: remove more __nolibc_enosys() fallbacks Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/12] tools/nolibc: prefer explicit 64-bit time-related system calls Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/12] tools/nolibc: gettimeofday(): avoid libgcc 64-bit divisions Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-02 8:31 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-11-02 9:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-02 9:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-10-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/12] tools/nolibc: use a custom struct timespec Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-02 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-11-02 8:40 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2025-11-02 9:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-02 9:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-10-29 16:03 ` [PATCH 10/12] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit time types Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:03 ` [PATCH 11/12] selftests/nolibc: test compatibility of timespec and __kernel_timespec Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 16:03 ` [PATCH 12/12] tools/nolibc: remove time conversions Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-30 14:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-02 8:44 ` [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit ino_t, off_t and time-related types Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251102084039.GC10797@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox