From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9EA1DEFE7; Sun, 2 Nov 2025 08:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762073074; cv=none; b=pHByZalb8xkiBSymFeM7NP6pvuJDG+S7jDBOMOUyZdCS2tUdaxM7L+m9T2eEmXCBirviS1lIdI08WHuxmzCRBkI9Driq4OiaiHafl06KbV3IuiCinQOy7kqkSRgkQrbDnuAu9gjSQNtzcZhJuBpHkczQiLuk/QKsCphvg5bgrjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762073074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MMvZZbkp3PNrjM80Icfk8JLbf5QXX2sLirUcqVj301A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pbXMx/UNMxfoSdPOugql9xV8Q/H9UVjfjvNTEfnFhEgFxiVzEHTuRyDcWjLmoWg4dSHKYxlGfQlktzc4a60R5ih5q39IVBu0Nd+y3/xrpVHZB03R/iaOshd0E+/42WREmlRe+8sIK0IHV+B6shhUTZ75l1snuers8oZZKQVRoww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b=EAuyzAa6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b="EAuyzAa6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1762073070; bh=7Rx+oyfR5vuNLBTCG3xVKdSQ7H39byCGk34YvTkomog=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=EAuyzAa6X28fvY7/Sg069GJsQv9u1UvovcvzmW0kGjW4RKBi6uZBK1EmrlfqRGoVG 399YDX1M2IQ+kgwvBciSswbK556bWcVzoS2fN8tQH2t0QMinwfWDYsDWlpMPganC1p KG50+qYQO4YQFBd/lJMuH6l+xUlNpML8ZTP/7fzY= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A68C06ED; Sun, 02 Nov 2025 09:44:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 5A28iT4o010992; Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:44:29 +0100 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:44:29 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Shuah Khan , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit ino_t, off_t and time-related types Message-ID: <20251102084429.GD10797@1wt.eu> References: <20251029-nolibc-uapi-types-v1-0-e79de3b215d8@weissschuh.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20251029-nolibc-uapi-types-v1-0-e79de3b215d8@weissschuh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:02:50PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > nolibc currently uses 32-bit types for various APIs. These are > problematic as their reduced value range can lead to truncated values. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh Thanks Thomas for this cleanup! Overall this looks good to me. I also tested my preinit code against it based both on latest and older UAPI headers (5.4) and everything still builds and seems to work fine. For the whole series: Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy