From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486D82FBE08 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762164529; cv=none; b=ZVbiwEA7AgKNx13x8OtHpD58R2vVJDQ6amFtgeXw5wSVqRjhPKyjNMlZBZG3TeogGCakuHljjfE0H7dcnpaPVFujOaEFnRKDOmJ8woK+0v2ZiELNTmK59L24eaESfDCn6qIlke0S6M5aAY3h/37jHCA4vhT3ogLSLiELioGA7qE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762164529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YsTF68mjR39B/r/G6EPCUdpxSXCB8HJ4vZ+J81ZFViU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=qxGWT/GurrHuICV1zwtTDZIauIblt0qNJ3279IQAJrXAWg17dNh2YFUOeXy5G9YYcaLpbpQMuhzGJZrNPzXKA7e92TY/eN5OPR3oJh+M8zh8IWe6IdxsH25954/gRmubGaPhXXKmYs63cim4WiKivR2GvF4n8yGA4Tx2Ue+lnqw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=DMNO6Hbf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="DMNO6Hbf" Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b6dbb4a209aso753946666b.1 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 02:08:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1762164526; x=1762769326; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tLS6qgKRGlV1tkSNCOlSCrCisKumvAST+7mt3QUKFME=; b=DMNO6HbfY7/ZVxGwmvwUUzErGvh8CWY+wb/crRNs3uS/5/PkUFPWJhyGKWEt1IgKv2 WbsPLhnvK8r/Kq6gNTAcTnmAExm6HgmdDaasRENjtlVfvbEPhVRJ+S5Kg+2ullVMdpSm cSIZRXF0SbA+q8HzSaKcJgfZ2dtT6dQwRU5R0mj8/Plx9PeCp10G4BgUXS0C7CA8h7R5 6z6WFB21x+xXrSyRbJQXQbTUtrCBTptX9FvVX7d2DUCO3KydSkvRjYGD+WDXisVosTGB 8ITCH6tNmhaXOGLiJeIww35gaRvT6n7WsDYKZDt9YmB4vfPmU9aBTOg5A7BIy3C5B9I+ 1dvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762164526; x=1762769326; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tLS6qgKRGlV1tkSNCOlSCrCisKumvAST+7mt3QUKFME=; b=j0djxytAy4zOt67dVVWsE/q0adImmTYK+0Q+xqMs8OaqqNReJAXtNZ0rp6HmLhkk9V 7qu0Y5WqnfyyLUrcakqD8lH9/IvkE84Xn2PTPvnAxiyfXruKMvjJhIIhWj0QcGe4cRGl 8+Wb3CzCB66KdXYkwfveU4fYRbW4xRf6/uZj0RvimU0GqVcxD5g8NXnCz//jALiWiQr3 DruUPodjNWt56SBch0GgDO+xow6Re1Aqdv3Llcx+WS7FGcpQcWmL47nLyLWa2pw/5TnA QvSYbKpHmK9TAVf96SmjXP807JYwxSU3xAU5s8cLRIZvq6J5ZQWsqVxYPKYNiFp70wCD r6hg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX557c+gaS17dx0wRiSFVKsfFepKXTitRLy4RGW1oKn1MoL3FTGPxxQ8Yrjzv+EIOKwcXdK2x9azmxMIxE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweYa8f+HvyQC6WLDgk0vwVEGXD1GFsPaMa2PzBqVkvYogUxESd 695pUbHmvRtmmoPXkEHAU6Iou3PJLDWXlV4lFb+siOJQ0sIHUsRbIi6g X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvpyE1sUaKxErKEyPRanLEOJjIMt9PFnI1b9ZpcgVt4slr+83vReccmuSyBc9C RxPNuf2feamPtbNwo6ubuuGc2e87/7A1oyZegyfvJWm9nsCgDWs7dxMyLICqhA1oIDqAHUcZvMn SKf3tQzryAjdzsfN7m09hv5w9yB0PVxDBlNY+GinFxZI3YH7MKuM2thh1a7OqJYLQs4sSM4O5rh KiPna8kobgcGuFSkXWSY/ZnW2DV1lUzkyOd7nNRbWtglKB9bXSNtKEWnuYHcqzpUdCvdianu6KZ 5OxL8ahJFPuMHv/lTfR66KpLazzWCawp2gl9KiCmysbt1Xj2uNBCPSULK+BIgbqyHKh8Pf/4iUN 94pDTWPdBrsywiL4s+beOGre5fVMUPVEIHkmWmC/jDLHtZXHgUq8yVToVcqbOCX10ll1+nWS2/9 TyRfSYPGRJgdVG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEv5yXN9Rq+z/PHyS8obHrzjUW6HYGA45FU+WSNF/Zev/u9SGVmMPbE9+9XkPkG1FxuYOM0eQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3d4f:b0:b70:6d3a:a08b with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b70700ad4dfmr1388461366b.10.1762164525413; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 02:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from foxbook (bgu110.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.28.84.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b718a2dd982sm74711866b.49.2025.11.03.02.08.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Nov 2025 02:08:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:08:35 +0100 From: Michal Pecio To: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: bp@alien8.de, da.gomez@samsung.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, petr.pavlu@suse.com, samitolvanen@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] x86: Use RCU in all users of __module_address(). Message-ID: <20251103110835.1dca378c.michal.pecio@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20250108090457.512198-23-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > x86: Use RCU in all users of __module_address(). > > __module_address() can be invoked within a RCU section, there is no > requirement to have preemption disabled. > > Replace the preempt_disable() section around __module_address() with > RCU. > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin > Cc: Borislav Petkov > Cc: Dave Hansen > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c | 3 +-- > arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c > index f17d166078823..276b5368ff6b0 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c > @@ -98,11 +98,10 @@ static inline bool within_module_coretext(void *addr) > #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES > struct module *mod; > > - preempt_disable(); > + guard(rcu)(); > mod = __module_address((unsigned long)addr); > if (mod && within_module_core((unsigned long)addr, mod)) > ret = true; > - preempt_enable(); > #endif > return ret; > } > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c > index d4705a348a804..977ee75e047c8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state) > return false; > > /* Don't let modules unload while we're reading their ORC data. */ > - preempt_disable(); > + guard(rcu)(); > > /* End-of-stack check for user tasks: */ > if (state->regs && user_mode(state->regs)) > @@ -669,14 +669,12 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state) > goto err; > } > > - preempt_enable(); > return true; Hi, There is a regression report on a distribution forum which involves an out of tree module on a patched kernel (yes, I know) calling stack_trace_save() in task context, which arrives here and apparently calls the various deref_stack_xxx() functions with preemption enabled, which in turn call stack_access_ok() leading to a BUG: Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/1183 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: caller is in_entry_stack+0x11/0x60 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 1183 Comm: Xorg Tainted: P OE 6.16.12-hardened1-1-hardened #1 PREEMPT(full) 6edb90a7a07fab33bbee72d6d5ef53ba6eec3b9c Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: Hardware name: ASUS All Series/Z97-E, BIOS 0803 02/23/2016 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: Call Trace: Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: check_preemption_disabled+0xe5/0xf0 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: in_entry_stack+0x11/0x60 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: get_stack_info+0x2c/0x80 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: stack_access_ok+0x51/0xa0 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: unwind_next_frame+0x1cb/0x7b0 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: ? _nv003168kms+0x42/0x50 [nvidia_modeset 90775ea8a26c5e58b97ef4b3f46eb45efa040eb2] Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: arch_stack_walk+0xa6/0x110 Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: ? _nv003168kms+0x42/0x50 [nvidia_modeset 90775ea8a26c5e58b97ef4b3f46eb45efa040eb2] Nov 02 21:44:30 ArchBasement kernel: stack_trace_save+0x4d/0x70 Is this nvidia doing something wrong, or a problem with this commit? The removed code suggests that preemption is allowed here, and as far as I see, this call trace is still possible on vanilla 6.18. Perhaps preempt_disable() needs to be restored around this code? Regards, Michal