public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu: Make atomic callbacks run on UP with disabled interrupts
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:31:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103143147.PBAiL3fW@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103141058.GD3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 2025-11-03 15:10:58 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On SMP callbacks in the "starting" range are invoked while the CPU is
> > brought up and interrupts are still disabled. Callbacks which are added
> > later ar invoked via the hotplug-thread on the target CPU and interrupts
> > are explicitly disabled.
> > In the UP case callbacks which are added later are invoked "directly"
> > without the thread. This is okay since there is just one CPU but with
> > enabled interrupts debug code, such as smp_processor_id(), will issue
> > warnings.
> > 
> > Disable interrupts before invoking the calback on UP if the state is
> > atomic and interrupts are expected to be disabled.
> > The "save" part is required because this is also invoked early in the
> > boot process while interrupts are disabled and must not be enabled. The
> > warnings aligns the function with cpuhp_thread_fun().
> > 
> > Fixes: 06ddd17521bf1 ("sched/smp: Always define is_percpu_thread() and scheduler_ipi()")
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> 
> Did we want me to merge this into sched/urgent or what was the
> hope/intention for this patch.

I did testing on ARM/UP and run into this. Therefore I would suggest
sched/urgent or the matching hotplug/urgent should one exist.

But since it is just a smp_processor_id() debug warning on UP and
nothing serious I don't mind to delay it until the next merge window.

Sebastian

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 12:03 [PATCH] cpu: Make atomic callbacks run on UP with disabled interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-03 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 13:10   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-03 14:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 13:28   ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-03 14:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 14:31       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251103143147.PBAiL3fW@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox