From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A29AD2C; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 23:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762298138; cv=none; b=llggW+OQgUX1dD6QAwNadtEHAuCnLorTqcMsNujXhX6v7OVNjpZbMMjYfDN9r5rkILTl3AeoBs+X/b5DbBfeRS+0Swzyt+0inIurBw3xkbV7q1UB3nDMATtuvE3aeeH2FWrhCV7Bk8U1PaP281o8B2Vwr3eX5F+K0fsnUhhc/Uw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762298138; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AvHazApTm6rnOE07byLu9Db1odTHNc2Q5jqYLJT32sE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NyaGX/scHQa3ypLRHQR7UxKULVqqPGN+zyCfhwJ7PRiVUqy0B2I3RcfRz7c2dKFG1Wk6mgsuPNVt/G2/boL4PPo4uViRpZtZfjH3TOtNlZ1XL+OwqEB8s9biNegyxWZsJbTeanM8TcL9asBAUnlPqgV52QD/95i8eslgYnM0le8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=chyyyNPj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="chyyyNPj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1762298137; x=1793834137; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AvHazApTm6rnOE07byLu9Db1odTHNc2Q5jqYLJT32sE=; b=chyyyNPjabDnk5gIS6FY4tkKiYlwbF4US64CbXtUfoLz9AcMHhYSwDzA A8Y1ZX4wqMuV1UrIown/zOeGbTGiJ1IK64FVEjVEqlqsyGXSICpFScNFG kfJcK448l+oakE9XS+wZ+kxfOVzX2CdPdPDsFeMW6kWeGKxPzw9FlEmhs 8Sy+wVkEjqxtpX93l0WuauaO2mISLB/M8n4aVUDo0qph90uDgA5z6DV5g +efpaZ3zaWpO3DsEYTTGl6z8tdLorOI74SkTNZhHF5AspfRj8f8dceUao TxN5tTkcUVN1Rv5LAW4Yf74LtEx9oTCVOMV/TC3bzVA18BIqH4SXSnr1D g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dyAWCKTfRReCylzip+WZ2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EmWjcoRRTn6waSk4ThUGeQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11603"; a="68059951" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,280,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="68059951" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2025 15:15:37 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3GbsULwITDGtzdlsPAC4nA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gvGurNZvRY6s72TM1Q0Mxw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,280,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="187732482" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 66d7546c76b2) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2025 15:15:35 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 66d7546c76b2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vGQFR-000RvM-0A; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 23:15:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:14:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Corbet , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel-doc: Issue warnings that were silently discarded Message-ID: <202511050720.nJ9ccENC-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251104215502.1049817-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251104215502.1049817-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Hi Andy, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on lwn/docs-next] [also build test WARNING on next-20251104] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.18-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/kernel-doc-Issue-warnings-that-were-silently-discarded/20251105-055629 base: git://git.lwn.net/linux.git docs-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251104215502.1049817-1-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel-doc: Issue warnings that were silently discarded config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251105/202511050720.nJ9ccENC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251105/202511050720.nJ9ccENC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511050720.nJ9ccENC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: block/blk-mq-dma.c:374 expecting prototype for blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_start(). Prototype was for blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_next() instead -- >> Warning: kernel/nstree.c:215 function parameter 'ns_tree' not described in '__ns_tree_adjoined_rcu' >> Warning: kernel/nstree.c:215 expecting prototype for ns_tree_adjoined_rcu(). Prototype was for __ns_tree_adjoined_rcu() instead -- >> Warning: lib/hweight.c:13 function parameter 'w' not described in '__sw_hweight32' >> Warning: lib/hweight.c:13 expecting prototype for hweightN(). Prototype was for __sw_hweight32() instead -- >> Warning: mm/vmalloc.c:4129 expecting prototype for vrealloc_node_align_noprof(). Prototype was for vrealloc_node_align() instead -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki