From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2101E9B22; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762355763; cv=none; b=VlRH7e713qb4H2YukRinCandeDeCqTSR0MSWHEil6n0pfP4drjNZt79CGd1KAFPm0sBpSECfYhB3wuaDFdijEISprGlK7V1veUR5jQkfFQ5DKa5CiN61TTP12e9u/qCjGvbDvC6uAfCKarMcNrhoNWNV0FBce+xcepAq1yltL7k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762355763; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lGKfhSh5+02JS4dVuQ/J2wVv7e845lJQQ2wyuyi9zKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nBsL0mQ/Yzwz+qa7TJDVD9LOjgtXRfqdIIpWymfl5T04rp35S2WZLvPAAyK6i4Sfn1A9x/fI2CveopwAJZYckSZsfW7XQr3lIRPJCoRXJwEcHNLYLbZ8tLT5YBp9Dd08j9fFVKNEF7jDDuFQYB/up6eDHyR21R0LL/qXUPQzXe0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UresLXaL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UresLXaL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAC6DC4CEFB; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:16:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762355763; bh=lGKfhSh5+02JS4dVuQ/J2wVv7e845lJQQ2wyuyi9zKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UresLXaLPonMlspRSUqfF87zGQJVx9n52WNjAe5OnQm+fiBG72BJNFe/lbc+9/y+0 VKz6D+RsX6MZibrcXdI5CSkMMCfRXpCV8OilwKohEvJovyxVod0K66tiLPdtq0tVb2 Eqa2L/geb+esmUY/cDBQ5DZh5JRRuE6KK7aOsB/P7AD386rc+O9W6c0AtSYYOip9Mr dnV72KsXCfHPubm0+VRAyoz3zAttH5k2prVInPZBVvViFYv4GWvnfgQ+3C5zt7kKqK ywyg6Ta0CbfBLfbVrFBXzhCreEJpnKByBiCCmujCHKXIgipNI6PKYOo8L9dwvM6hfZ kTm7pJ5Bu4SNw== Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:15:59 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Corey Minyard Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree Message-ID: <20251105151559.GI8064@google.com> References: <20251027080835.04e0a4c2@canb.auug.org.au> <20251105094750.GF8064@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, 05 Nov 2025, Corey Minyard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 09:47:50AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different > > > commits (but the same patches): > > > > > > 91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure") > > > fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()") > > > > > > These are commits > > > > > > 4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure") > > > 0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()") > > > > > > in Linus' tree. > > > > This is because Corey applied patches that they shouldn't have done, > > despite being expressively requested not to! > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009095611.GC8757@google.com/ > > I missed this completely, I'm sorry. > > If there's anything I can do to fix this, I will, but I'm not sure what > is best now. Just the fact that you have now acknowledged this is enough for me. However frustrating it may be, no real harm was done. Thanks for reaching out. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]