From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Safin <a.safin@rosa.ru>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-patches@linuxtesting.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: hashtab: fix 32-bit overflow in memory usage calculation
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 11:41:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107114127.4e130fb2@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107100310.61478-1-a.safin@rosa.ru>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:03:05 +0300
Alexei Safin <a.safin@rosa.ru> wrote:
> The intermediate product value_size * num_possible_cpus() is evaluated
> in 32-bit arithmetic and only then promoted to 64 bits. On systems with
> large value_size and many possible CPUs this can overflow and lead to
> an underestimated memory usage.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
That code is insane.
The size being calculated looks like a kernel memory size.
You really don't want to be allocating single structures that exceed 4GB.
David
>
> Fixes: 304849a27b34 ("bpf: hashtab memory usage")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Safin <a.safin@rosa.ru>
> ---
> v2: Promote value_size to u64 at declaration to avoid 32-bit overflow
> in all arithmetic using this variable (suggested by Yafang Shao)
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 570e2f723144..1f0add26ba3f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -2252,7 +2252,7 @@ static long bpf_for_each_hash_elem(struct bpf_map *map, bpf_callback_t callback_
> static u64 htab_map_mem_usage(const struct bpf_map *map)
> {
> struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
> - u32 value_size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> + u64 value_size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> bool prealloc = htab_is_prealloc(htab);
> bool percpu = htab_is_percpu(htab);
> bool lru = htab_is_lru(htab);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 10:03 [PATCH v2] bpf: hashtab: fix 32-bit overflow in memory usage calculation Alexei Safin
2025-11-07 11:35 ` Yafang Shao
2025-11-07 11:41 ` David Laight [this message]
2025-11-09 3:00 ` Yafang Shao
2025-11-09 8:20 ` Yafang Shao
2025-11-09 11:00 ` Алексей Сафин
2025-11-09 12:10 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251107114127.4e130fb2@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=a.safin@rosa.ru \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-patches@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox