From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 12:06:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110120650.00004de8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13883374.uLZWGnKmhe@rafael.j.wysocki>
On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 19:35:09 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The runtime PM usage counter guards introduced recently:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6196611.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki/
>
> and then fixed:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5943878.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki/
>
> should generally work, but using them feels sort of arcane and cryptic
> even though the underlying concept is relatively straightforward.
>
> For this reason, runtime PM wrapper macros around ACQUIRE() and
> ACQUIRE_ERR() involving the new guards are introduced in this series
> (patch [1/3]) and then used in the code already using the guards (patches
> [2/3] and [3/3]) to make it look more straightforward.
>
> Thanks!
It's an interesting trade off between completely hiding the magic variables
and verbosity. The PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR smells like something we'd
expect to be using global state (given no parameters), but it is of
course just local with a magic name. Will take a little getting
used to but then so does all this cleanup.h magic. So on balance
I think this is a good change.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 18:35 [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-07 18:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for ACQUIRE()/ACQUIRE_ERR() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-10 16:06 ` Frank Li
2025-11-07 18:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] PCI/sysfs: Use PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE()/PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-07 18:41 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI: TAD: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-10 12:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-11-12 6:39 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards Dhruva Gole
2025-11-12 19:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 21:27 ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-12 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-13 11:35 ` Dhruva Gole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110120650.00004de8@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=zhangqilong3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox