Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: minor code cleanups

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:10:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 03:33:41PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> > - In dl_server_timer, there is same dl_runtime check above. So
> > this check is duplicate. This could save a few cycles.
> > 
> > - In select_task_rq_dl, there is only one goto statement, there is
> > no need for it. 
> > 
> > No functional changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 +-----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index 7b7671060bf9..8b7c4ee41fd8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -1166,9 +1166,6 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_server_timer(struct hrtimer *timer, struct sched_
> >  		sched_clock_tick();
> >  		update_rq_clock(rq);
> >  
> > -		if (!dl_se->dl_runtime)
> > -			return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> > -
> >  		if (dl_se->dl_defer_armed) {
> >  			/*
> >  			 * First check if the server could consume runtime in background.
> 
> That one got lost here:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251020141130.GJ3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

I deleted this hunk and frobbed the changelog. Should be in
queue/sched/core now.